EU - Russia Energy Relations and Political - Economic Ideology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Russia and the European Union cannot reach a conclusive agreement on major issues in energy relations.Russian and EU economic policymaking from the 1970s onwards developed mutually incompatible ideological foundations.The EU adopted a neoliberal market framework with some social market characteristics, while Russia functions along economic nationalist ideas.These ideological influences informed the development of energy policy in each respective party.The EU insists that Russia deal with the internal European Energy market through a free market framework, while Russia prefers to do business with the EU without modifying its economic model in the energy industry.This has resulted in disagreements in negotiations for Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, the Energy Charter Treaty, and the Third Energy Package.Both Russia and the EU would benefit from cooperation due to energy interdependence, but each party needs to recognize and acknowledge their counterparts' interests for achievable long-term progress. Chapter 1: Introduction Research ProblemEnergy security is a foremost concern among the EU and its member states over the last two decades since the fall of the Soviet Union.European energy demands in natural gas and oil have steadily increased over the same period, and are projected to continue doing so into the near future.Since at least 1995, Russia has steadily become Europe's largest source of oil and natural gas supplies; in 2010, Russia's energy exports to Europe (180,654 thousand tonnes) were nearly equivalent to the combined export volumes of the next four largest suppliers to Europe (Norway, Libya, Saudi Arabia, and Kazakhstan). 1 Ever since 1991, the EU and Russia have attempted to lay down a framework to establish a stable, predictable supply of energy from Russia to Europe. Some of the most notable attempts have been the Partnership and CooperationAgreement, the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), and the Transit Protocol and the Third Energy Package, the latter of which, although is not directed at Russia, has an impact on the latter's energy interests in Europe.To date, neither of these agreements have come to fruition or led to any substantive outcome.Russia initially signed on to the ECT, but has since withdrawn; Russia refuses to ratify the Transit Protocol, and continues to criticize the Third Energy Package. 1 1 European Commission, EU Energy in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2012.2012, p. 64.http:// ec.europa.eu/energy/publications/doc/2012_energy_figures.pdf(Accessed July 1, 2013).Weights of nonliquid and non-solid energy products are converted into tons according to their calorific content relative to oil (see EU Energy in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2012, Appendix 6. No. 2).All subsequent measurements follow this methodology.5 Denzau and North, "Shared Mental Models," p. 4. 6
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».