Bibliographic record
Abstract
Russia and the European Union cannot reach a conclusive agreement on major issues in energy relations.Russian and EU economic policymaking from the 1970s onwards developed mutually incompatible ideological foundations.The EU adopted a neoliberal market framework with some social market characteristics, while Russia functions along economic nationalist ideas.These ideological influences informed the development of energy policy in each respective party.The EU insists that Russia deal with the internal European Energy market through a free market framework, while Russia prefers to do business with the EU without modifying its economic model in the energy industry.This has resulted in disagreements in negotiations for Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, the Energy Charter Treaty, and the Third Energy Package.Both Russia and the EU would benefit from cooperation due to energy interdependence, but each party needs to recognize and acknowledge their counterparts' interests for achievable long-term progress. Chapter 1: Introduction Research ProblemEnergy security is a foremost concern among the EU and its member states over the last two decades since the fall of the Soviet Union.European energy demands in natural gas and oil have steadily increased over the same period, and are projected to continue doing so into the near future.Since at least 1995, Russia has steadily become Europe's largest source of oil and natural gas supplies; in 2010, Russia's energy exports to Europe (180,654 thousand tonnes) were nearly equivalent to the combined export volumes of the next four largest suppliers to Europe (Norway, Libya, Saudi Arabia, and Kazakhstan). 1 Ever since 1991, the EU and Russia have attempted to lay down a framework to establish a stable, predictable supply of energy from Russia to Europe. Some of the most notable attempts have been the Partnership and CooperationAgreement, the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), and the Transit Protocol and the Third Energy Package, the latter of which, although is not directed at Russia, has an impact on the latter's energy interests in Europe.To date, neither of these agreements have come to fruition or led to any substantive outcome.Russia initially signed on to the ECT, but has since withdrawn; Russia refuses to ratify the Transit Protocol, and continues to criticize the Third Energy Package. 1 1 European Commission, EU Energy in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2012.2012, p. 64.http:// ec.europa.eu/energy/publications/doc/2012_energy_figures.pdf(Accessed July 1, 2013).Weights of nonliquid and non-solid energy products are converted into tons according to their calorific content relative to oil (see EU Energy in Figures Statistical Pocketbook 2012, Appendix 6. No. 2).All subsequent measurements follow this methodology.5 Denzau and North, "Shared Mental Models," p. 4. 6
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".