Identification of electrical rotational activity in noisy cardiac tissue recordings using a deep neural network
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Deep learning is increasingly used in modern biomedical research and applications due to the substantial availability of large clinical datasets. These approaches are invaluable in tasks involving noisy imaging data, such as tumour segmentation in histological images. In cardiology, a deep learning approach could be helpful in real-time tracking of the sources of arrhythmia, i.e. electrical rotational activity in the heart. However, the existing optical or electrophysiological recordings that could be used for training such a model are recorded under highly variable conditions and are not always annotated, thereby requiring data augmentation. Purpose To use deep neural networks trained on synthetic data to obtain concise (low dimensional) representations of noisy optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias and rapidly locate spiral wave centres. Methods To overcome the lack of experimental training data, a digital twin of a neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocyte monolayer was used to create a large synthetic training dataset of noiseless spiral wave recordings. Spiral wave centres were detected and labelled by making use of classical algorithms which are proven to work well on noiseless data. After labelling the centres, noise was added to the spiral wave recordings to simulate realistic experimental measurements. Subsequently, these data were fed into three different deep learning architectures: 1) a variational auto-encoder (VAE) to denoise optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias in an unsupervised manner, 2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the spiral centres, and 3) a combination of both to denoise the recording and detect centres simultaneously. Results After training on synthetic datasets, each architecture could accurately predict what it was designed for (noiseless wave fronts, spiral centres including chirality, or both) on both synthetic and experimental data. These spiral centre detection results were compared with 5 classical methods of denoising and spiral centre detection for accuracy and speed. Our method was as accurate as the best performing yet slow classical algorithm, which can only detect centres after observing a full rotation cycle (~300ms). At the same time, it was as fast as the fastest classical method, needing only 30ms after enabling the algorithm to detect spiral wave centres. This allows quasi-real-time tracking of arrhythmic sources. Conclusion This study reveals that modern deep learning strategies in combination with synthetic simulation datasets can be used on experimental measurements to aid in the development of new technologies, here applied to the detection of spiral wave centres in optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias. Given the combination of speed and accuracy at which these algorithms produce results, further exploration and refinement may improve the identification of targets for catheter ablation, thereby potentially improving the outcome.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».