MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280581529 · doi:10.1093/europace/euac053.620

Identification of electrical rotational activity in noisy cardiac tissue recordings using a deep neural network

2022· article· en· W4280581529 on OpenAlexaff
Tim De Coster, Nina Kudryashova, Georgy Derevyanko, AAF De Vries, DA Pijnappels, AV Panfilov

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkMedicineSegmentationAutoencoderArtificial neural networkSpiral (railway)Pattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)Cardiac arrhythmiaOptical mappingIdentification (biology)Computer scienceImage (mathematics)Cardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Deep learning is increasingly used in modern biomedical research and applications due to the substantial availability of large clinical datasets. These approaches are invaluable in tasks involving noisy imaging data, such as tumour segmentation in histological images. In cardiology, a deep learning approach could be helpful in real-time tracking of the sources of arrhythmia, i.e. electrical rotational activity in the heart. However, the existing optical or electrophysiological recordings that could be used for training such a model are recorded under highly variable conditions and are not always annotated, thereby requiring data augmentation. Purpose To use deep neural networks trained on synthetic data to obtain concise (low dimensional) representations of noisy optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias and rapidly locate spiral wave centres. Methods To overcome the lack of experimental training data, a digital twin of a neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocyte monolayer was used to create a large synthetic training dataset of noiseless spiral wave recordings. Spiral wave centres were detected and labelled by making use of classical algorithms which are proven to work well on noiseless data. After labelling the centres, noise was added to the spiral wave recordings to simulate realistic experimental measurements. Subsequently, these data were fed into three different deep learning architectures: 1) a variational auto-encoder (VAE) to denoise optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias in an unsupervised manner, 2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect the spiral centres, and 3) a combination of both to denoise the recording and detect centres simultaneously. Results After training on synthetic datasets, each architecture could accurately predict what it was designed for (noiseless wave fronts, spiral centres including chirality, or both) on both synthetic and experimental data. These spiral centre detection results were compared with 5 classical methods of denoising and spiral centre detection for accuracy and speed. Our method was as accurate as the best performing yet slow classical algorithm, which can only detect centres after observing a full rotation cycle (~300ms). At the same time, it was as fast as the fastest classical method, needing only 30ms after enabling the algorithm to detect spiral wave centres. This allows quasi-real-time tracking of arrhythmic sources. Conclusion This study reveals that modern deep learning strategies in combination with synthetic simulation datasets can be used on experimental measurements to aid in the development of new technologies, here applied to the detection of spiral wave centres in optical mapping recordings of cardiac arrhythmias. Given the combination of speed and accuracy at which these algorithms produce results, further exploration and refinement may improve the identification of targets for catheter ablation, thereby potentially improving the outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207