Outcomes of patients with unilateral retinoblastoma: A report from the RIVERBOAT Consortium.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
10046 Background: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common tumor of the eye in childhood. Intraocular RB cure rates approach 100%. Therefore, treatment now focuses on globe salvage preserving functional vision. The Research Into Visual Endpoints and RB Health Outcomes After Treatment (RIVERBOAT) consortium was established to examine patient health outcomes, including vision, in the contemporary therapy era. Methods: Patients with RB treated at consortium centers from 2007 to present were identified. Medical record abstraction was performed for disease presentation, treatment, and outcomes. A subset of the patients returned to centers and completed functional vision questionnaires (Child Vision Function Questionnaire - ages 0 – 7 and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children - ages > 8) and had visual acuity assessed. For participants who could not yet return for a study evaluation, medical record abstraction alone was performed. Results: Among 463 participants enrolled to date, 270 (58%) had unilateral disease. One patient with metastatic RB did not survive, resulting in overall survival of 99.6. There was one case of secondary leukemia. The eye group distribution (International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification) was 0.4% A, 5.6% B, 7.0% C, 36.0% D, 49.0% E and 2.0% not classified. 131 (49%) patients underwent primary enucleation and are not included in further analyses. Among the remaining 139 patients, 3% were treated with local ophthalmic therapy only, 22% with intravenous chemotherapy (IV) only, 53% with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) only, 22% with IV and IAC, and 35% required secondary enucleation. Globe salvage after chemotherapy was successful in 100% A, 93% B, 82% C, 72% D, and 48% E eyes. This salvage was achieved with IV only, IAC only, or both in 22%, 58% and 20% respectively. The mean percentage of patients receiving IAC per year increased from 13% (2008 – 2013) to 21% (2014 – 2017) to 28% (2018 – 2022). In 29 patients without enucleation who reported functional vision to date, the mean scores (survey theoretical ranges) were 0.72 for < 3 years (0.57 to 0.87), 0.82 for 3 -7 years (0.56 to 0.94) and -2.72 for > 8 years (-2.53 to -0.51), all considered good functional vision. In 20 of these 29 patients, 4 eyes had normal vision (20/20-20/40) across A to D groups. Moderate vision loss (> 20/40 – 20/70) was noted in 3 D eyes and low vision (> 20/70 - < 20/200) in 1 D eye. Twelve B through E eyes met criteria for a legally blind eye (>20/200). Conclusions: In this cohort of RB patients with unilateral disease treated from 2007 - 2022, 66% required primary or secondary enucleation. Among 29 patients with globe salvage, self-reported functional vision was good, but 12 eyes in 20 of the patients were legally blind. IAC only or IV plus IAC was most used in those who avoided secondary enucleation. With ongoing cohort accrual and increased IAC use, it will remain to be determined if globe salvage with functional vision will improve.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».