Outcomes of patients with unilateral retinoblastoma: A report from the RIVERBOAT Consortium.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10046 Background: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common tumor of the eye in childhood. Intraocular RB cure rates approach 100%. Therefore, treatment now focuses on globe salvage preserving functional vision. The Research Into Visual Endpoints and RB Health Outcomes After Treatment (RIVERBOAT) consortium was established to examine patient health outcomes, including vision, in the contemporary therapy era. Methods: Patients with RB treated at consortium centers from 2007 to present were identified. Medical record abstraction was performed for disease presentation, treatment, and outcomes. A subset of the patients returned to centers and completed functional vision questionnaires (Child Vision Function Questionnaire - ages 0 – 7 and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children - ages > 8) and had visual acuity assessed. For participants who could not yet return for a study evaluation, medical record abstraction alone was performed. Results: Among 463 participants enrolled to date, 270 (58%) had unilateral disease. One patient with metastatic RB did not survive, resulting in overall survival of 99.6. There was one case of secondary leukemia. The eye group distribution (International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification) was 0.4% A, 5.6% B, 7.0% C, 36.0% D, 49.0% E and 2.0% not classified. 131 (49%) patients underwent primary enucleation and are not included in further analyses. Among the remaining 139 patients, 3% were treated with local ophthalmic therapy only, 22% with intravenous chemotherapy (IV) only, 53% with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) only, 22% with IV and IAC, and 35% required secondary enucleation. Globe salvage after chemotherapy was successful in 100% A, 93% B, 82% C, 72% D, and 48% E eyes. This salvage was achieved with IV only, IAC only, or both in 22%, 58% and 20% respectively. The mean percentage of patients receiving IAC per year increased from 13% (2008 – 2013) to 21% (2014 – 2017) to 28% (2018 – 2022). In 29 patients without enucleation who reported functional vision to date, the mean scores (survey theoretical ranges) were 0.72 for < 3 years (0.57 to 0.87), 0.82 for 3 -7 years (0.56 to 0.94) and -2.72 for > 8 years (-2.53 to -0.51), all considered good functional vision. In 20 of these 29 patients, 4 eyes had normal vision (20/20-20/40) across A to D groups. Moderate vision loss (> 20/40 – 20/70) was noted in 3 D eyes and low vision (> 20/70 - < 20/200) in 1 D eye. Twelve B through E eyes met criteria for a legally blind eye (>20/200). Conclusions: In this cohort of RB patients with unilateral disease treated from 2007 - 2022, 66% required primary or secondary enucleation. Among 29 patients with globe salvage, self-reported functional vision was good, but 12 eyes in 20 of the patients were legally blind. IAC only or IV plus IAC was most used in those who avoided secondary enucleation. With ongoing cohort accrual and increased IAC use, it will remain to be determined if globe salvage with functional vision will improve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".