MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4281739518 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.26.493568

HIV proviral genetic diversity, compartmentalization and inferred dynamics in lung and blood during long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy

2022· preprint· en· W4281739518 sur OpenAlexafffund
Aniqa Shahid, Bradley R. Jones, Julia Yang, Winnie Dong, Tawimas Shaipanich, Kathryn Donohoe, Chanson J. Brumme, Jeffrey B. Joy, Janice M. Leung, Zabrina L. Brumme

Notice bibliographique

RevuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueHIV Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaAIDS VancouverSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on AgingNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthMichael Smith Health Research BC
Mots-clésBiologyContext (archaeology)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Genetic diversityCompartmentalization (fire protection)Coalescent theoryVirologyLungAntiretroviral therapyDiversity (politics)Evolutionary biologyImmunologyGeneticsViral loadPhylogeneticsPopulationGeneMedicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The lung is an understudied site of HIV persistence. We isolated 882 subgenomic proviral sequences by single-genome approaches from blood and lung from nine individuals on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), and characterized genetic diversity and compartmentalization using formal tests. Consistent with clonal expansion as a driver of HIV persistence, identical sequences comprised between 9% to 86% of within-host datasets, though their location (blood vs. lung) followed no consistent pattern. The majority (77%) of participants harbored at least one sequence shared across blood and lung, supporting the migration of clonally-expanded cells between sites. No participant exhibited genetic compartmentalization so obvious that it was visually apparent in a phylogeny. When formal tests were applied however, two (22%) participants showed modest yet significant support for compartmentalization when analysis was restricted to distinct proviruses per site. This increased to four participants (44%) when considering all within-host sequences. Thus, while a minority of individuals harbor somewhat distinctive proviral populations in blood and lung, these can simply be due to unequal distributions of clonally-expanded sequences. Importantly, the extent of lung proviral diversity on ART strongly reflected that in blood (Spearman ρ = 0.98, p < 0.0001), confirming blood as a strong indicator of total body proviral diversity. Analysis of on-ART proviral diversity in context of pre-therapy viral diversity in two participants revealed marked differences in proviral longevity and dynamics. Whereas one participant’s proviral pool was rich in ancestral sequences that recapitulated more of HIV’s within-host evolutionary history, the other’s largely comprised more contemporary sequences, including ones that re-seeded the reservoir during a three-year treatment interruption. Results highlight the genetic complexity of proviruses persisting in lung and blood during ART, and the uniqueness of each individual’s proviral composition. Individualized HIV remission and cure strategies may be needed to overcome these challenges. Author Summary HIV persists in the body despite long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Much of our knowledge about the HIV reservoir comes from studying proviruses in blood, but a fundamental question is whether these are distinct from those in tissues. The lung could theoretically engender genetically distinctive HIV populations, but this remains understudied. Our analysis of nearly 900 proviral sequences from blood and lung of nine individuals with HIV receiving long-term therapy revealed substantial within-host heterogeneity, yet some common patterns. Identical sequences (consistent with clonal expansion of infected cells) were observed in everyone, though at different (9-86%) frequencies. Recovery of shared sequences across blood and lung was common (77% of participants). Fewer than half of participants exhibited blood-lung genetic compartmentalization, and only modestly so. Moreover, when present, compartmentalization was often attributable to differential distribution of identical sequences, not the presence of genetically distinctive populations, across sites. Results also revealed marked inter-individual differences in proviral dynamics, as evidenced by the proportion of persisting proviruses that represented ancestral versus more recently-circulating viral sequences. Critically, the extent of within-host proviral diversity in blood correlated strongly with that in lung, indicating that despite inter-individual heterogeneity, blood is a strong indicator of proviral diversity elsewhere in the body.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Même sujetHIV Research and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→