HIV proviral genetic diversity, compartmentalization and inferred dynamics in lung and blood during long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The lung is an understudied site of HIV persistence. We isolated 882 subgenomic proviral sequences by single-genome approaches from blood and lung from nine individuals on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), and characterized genetic diversity and compartmentalization using formal tests. Consistent with clonal expansion as a driver of HIV persistence, identical sequences comprised between 9% to 86% of within-host datasets, though their location (blood vs. lung) followed no consistent pattern. The majority (77%) of participants harbored at least one sequence shared across blood and lung, supporting the migration of clonally-expanded cells between sites. No participant exhibited genetic compartmentalization so obvious that it was visually apparent in a phylogeny. When formal tests were applied however, two (22%) participants showed modest yet significant support for compartmentalization when analysis was restricted to distinct proviruses per site. This increased to four participants (44%) when considering all within-host sequences. Thus, while a minority of individuals harbor somewhat distinctive proviral populations in blood and lung, these can simply be due to unequal distributions of clonally-expanded sequences. Importantly, the extent of lung proviral diversity on ART strongly reflected that in blood (Spearman ρ = 0.98, p < 0.0001), confirming blood as a strong indicator of total body proviral diversity. Analysis of on-ART proviral diversity in context of pre-therapy viral diversity in two participants revealed marked differences in proviral longevity and dynamics. Whereas one participant’s proviral pool was rich in ancestral sequences that recapitulated more of HIV’s within-host evolutionary history, the other’s largely comprised more contemporary sequences, including ones that re-seeded the reservoir during a three-year treatment interruption. Results highlight the genetic complexity of proviruses persisting in lung and blood during ART, and the uniqueness of each individual’s proviral composition. Individualized HIV remission and cure strategies may be needed to overcome these challenges. Author Summary HIV persists in the body despite long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Much of our knowledge about the HIV reservoir comes from studying proviruses in blood, but a fundamental question is whether these are distinct from those in tissues. The lung could theoretically engender genetically distinctive HIV populations, but this remains understudied. Our analysis of nearly 900 proviral sequences from blood and lung of nine individuals with HIV receiving long-term therapy revealed substantial within-host heterogeneity, yet some common patterns. Identical sequences (consistent with clonal expansion of infected cells) were observed in everyone, though at different (9-86%) frequencies. Recovery of shared sequences across blood and lung was common (77% of participants). Fewer than half of participants exhibited blood-lung genetic compartmentalization, and only modestly so. Moreover, when present, compartmentalization was often attributable to differential distribution of identical sequences, not the presence of genetically distinctive populations, across sites. Results also revealed marked inter-individual differences in proviral dynamics, as evidenced by the proportion of persisting proviruses that represented ancestral versus more recently-circulating viral sequences. Critically, the extent of within-host proviral diversity in blood correlated strongly with that in lung, indicating that despite inter-individual heterogeneity, blood is a strong indicator of proviral diversity elsewhere in the body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".