"We Need a Press—a Press of Our Own": The Black Press beyond Abolition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"We Need a Press—a Press of Our Own"The Black Press beyond Abolition Jim Casey (bio) The purpose of this essay is to counter a common misunderstanding that conflates the early Black press with the antislavery press. This view has held sway for decades in countless bibliographies and library catalogs, not to mention books, articles, and syllabi.1 The largest bibliography of African American periodicals, for example, includes dozens of white-edited abolitionist newspapers.2 To be sure, the Black men and women who edited antebellum newspapers did fight fiercely for the end of slavery, but they cared about far more. They created a press that dealt with the full range of issues and interests that attended antebellum Black life. The fight to abolish slavery was one piece of a much broader and more complex struggle for Black freedom and justice in the United States. This shift is less a matter of historiography than historical accuracy. Antebellum Black editors almost always asserted an independence and remit that exceeded the antislavery societies. In columns written to introduce every new publication, editors staked out a vast range of editorial positions and perspectives that catered to their ostensibly free Black readers. These columns touched on many topics, ranging from matters of collective self-defense—against racism, [End Page 117] colonization, and state violence—to concerns for the progress of their communities—education, temperance, civil rights, and Protestant Christianity.3 Black editors used these columns to make an appeal to their prospective readers for the value of papers edited by African Americans. Many argued that Black communities needed newspapers conducted by Black editors. Those appeals, in practice and principle, expand an intellectual history of Black print and media that, while difficult to summarize neatly, offers a number of provocations to rethink the place of newspaper editors and periodical publishing in the nineteenth-century United States. The history of the early Black press is ready for such a broad reconsideration. The case for disambiguating the Black and antislavery presses may not be widely observed, but it has been well established. A litany of specialists on the Black press have made this argument for decades, from Kenneth D. Nordin to Frankie Hutton.4 As Frances Smith Foster writes, the Black press was founded on "the desire to create a positive and purposeful self-identified African America."5 Despite that body of scholarship, and the wider resurgence of interest today in African American print culture, the history of the early Black press remains [End Page 118] largely unwritten beyond a dozen surveys and bibliographies that, while invaluable, are now all at least two decades old and predate the advent of most online resources.6 It has become possible to tell a much fuller story. The scale of the early Black press belies its second-class status. Before the end of the Civil War, more than one hundred Black men and women edited at least fifty-five different newspapers or magazines.7 Those publications sprang up in eight states (New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Ohio, Connecticut, California, and Indiana) and in Canada. Nearly half of these publications lasted two years or longer. By a conservative estimate, African Americans edited at least twenty-five hundred issues of periodicals during the antebellum era. Some of those issues have been lost over the centuries. Far more survive. It is possible today to locate copies for at least thirty publications. Evidence for the other twenty-five titles can be found in numerous reprints, references, and coverage in other antebellum newspapers. It is very likely that there are more issues and titles yet to be rediscovered. Tracing the motives and objects of the early Black press leads to a few basic findings. Black editors had no interest in being subordinates of the white-run antislavery newspapers and associations. A few Black editors explicitly devoted their papers to ending slavery—such as David Ruggles, Frederick Douglass, and Benjamin F Roberts—but the experiences forced them to be even more fiercely independent. Consequently, many Black newspapers focused on the need for equal representation in the press, attuned to the power of newspapers to foster community and to encourage collective political action. This body of...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».