MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281820857 · doi:10.1353/cwh.2022.0010

"We Need a Press—a Press of Our Own": The Black Press beyond Abolition

2022· article· en· W4281820857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jim Casey

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil War history · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperAppealWhite (mutation)HistoriographyLawProtestantismEconomic JusticeRacismSociologyHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"We Need a Press—a Press of Our Own"The Black Press beyond Abolition Jim Casey (bio) The purpose of this essay is to counter a common misunderstanding that conflates the early Black press with the antislavery press. This view has held sway for decades in countless bibliographies and library catalogs, not to mention books, articles, and syllabi.1 The largest bibliography of African American periodicals, for example, includes dozens of white-edited abolitionist newspapers.2 To be sure, the Black men and women who edited antebellum newspapers did fight fiercely for the end of slavery, but they cared about far more. They created a press that dealt with the full range of issues and interests that attended antebellum Black life. The fight to abolish slavery was one piece of a much broader and more complex struggle for Black freedom and justice in the United States. This shift is less a matter of historiography than historical accuracy. Antebellum Black editors almost always asserted an independence and remit that exceeded the antislavery societies. In columns written to introduce every new publication, editors staked out a vast range of editorial positions and perspectives that catered to their ostensibly free Black readers. These columns touched on many topics, ranging from matters of collective self-defense—against racism, [End Page 117] colonization, and state violence—to concerns for the progress of their communities—education, temperance, civil rights, and Protestant Christianity.3 Black editors used these columns to make an appeal to their prospective readers for the value of papers edited by African Americans. Many argued that Black communities needed newspapers conducted by Black editors. Those appeals, in practice and principle, expand an intellectual history of Black print and media that, while difficult to summarize neatly, offers a number of provocations to rethink the place of newspaper editors and periodical publishing in the nineteenth-century United States. The history of the early Black press is ready for such a broad reconsideration. The case for disambiguating the Black and antislavery presses may not be widely observed, but it has been well established. A litany of specialists on the Black press have made this argument for decades, from Kenneth D. Nordin to Frankie Hutton.4 As Frances Smith Foster writes, the Black press was founded on "the desire to create a positive and purposeful self-identified African America."5 Despite that body of scholarship, and the wider resurgence of interest today in African American print culture, the history of the early Black press remains [End Page 118] largely unwritten beyond a dozen surveys and bibliographies that, while invaluable, are now all at least two decades old and predate the advent of most online resources.6 It has become possible to tell a much fuller story. The scale of the early Black press belies its second-class status. Before the end of the Civil War, more than one hundred Black men and women edited at least fifty-five different newspapers or magazines.7 Those publications sprang up in eight states (New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Ohio, Connecticut, California, and Indiana) and in Canada. Nearly half of these publications lasted two years or longer. By a conservative estimate, African Americans edited at least twenty-five hundred issues of periodicals during the antebellum era. Some of those issues have been lost over the centuries. Far more survive. It is possible today to locate copies for at least thirty publications. Evidence for the other twenty-five titles can be found in numerous reprints, references, and coverage in other antebellum newspapers. It is very likely that there are more issues and titles yet to be rediscovered. Tracing the motives and objects of the early Black press leads to a few basic findings. Black editors had no interest in being subordinates of the white-run antislavery newspapers and associations. A few Black editors explicitly devoted their papers to ending slavery—such as David Ruggles, Frederick Douglass, and Benjamin F Roberts—but the experiences forced them to be even more fiercely independent. Consequently, many Black newspapers focused on the need for equal representation in the press, attuned to the power of newspapers to foster community and to encourage collective political action. This body of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil War historySame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207