First Report of Halo Blight on Hop Caused by <i>Diaporthe humulicola</i> in New York
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In late July and August 2015, foliar disease was observed in three hop (Humulus lupulus; unknown cultivars) yards in Ontario, Otsego, and Putnam counties, New York (NY). Disease incidence ranged between 70 and 90% of plants, and up to 25% of the leaves per plant were affected. Leaf symptoms were large, necrotic patches with a chlorotic halo (2 to 10 cm diam.). Leaves and dry, easily shattered cones were placed at high humidity for 10 days. Pycnidia were abundant in leaf lesions which extruded conidia. Pycnidia were also observed on cone bracts and bracteoles. Fifteen isolations were made from each yard by placing a pycnidium onto 2% water agar + 0.02% (w/v) ampicillin. Colonies were hyphal tipped and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) before incubation at 20°C with a 12-h photoperiod. Colonies on PDA had flat mycelia and were white to cream in color. The isolation frequency was 100%. To induce sporulation, five isolates were grown on PDA with autoclaved alfalfa stems for 7 to 10 days. Alpha conidia were hyaline, and oval with obtuse ends. Mean alpha conidial dimensions were (n = 20): 9.1 m × 3.4 µm (BE1; Ontario Co.); 11.8 × 3.8 µm (BE34; Ontario Co.); 9.6 × 4.1 µm (BE10; Ontario Co.); 10.2 × 3.7 µm (BE52; Otsego Co.); and 10.3 × 3.6 µm (BE69; Putnam Co.). Beta conidia were not observed. DNA was extracted and PCR performed to amplify the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (primers ITS1/ITS4; White et al. 1990), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF; EF1-728F/EF1-986R; Carbone and Kohn 1999), a partial region of β-tubulin (TUB; Bt2a/Bt2b; Glass and Donaldson 1995), a partial region of histone 3 (H3) (H3; CYLH3F/H3-1b Crous et al. 2004), and calmodulin (CAL; CAL-228F/CAL2Rd; Groenewald et al. 2013) genes. For all NY isolates, sequence similarity was >99% to D. humulicola CT2018-3 for the ITS region, and TEF, HIS, and CAL genes. Sequence similarity to CT2018-3 for the TUB region ranged from 86.96% (BE-1) to 96.15% (BE-10). . Analyses with the ITS, TEF, CAL, and HIS sequences supported our identification of the NY isolates as D. humulicola. Sequences were deposited in GenBank (OM370960 to OM370984). For pathogenicity testing, BE-34 and BE-69 were grown on PDA + autoclaved alfalfa stems at room temperature and a 12-h photoperiod for 10 days. Conidia were harvested by flooding the plate with sterile water. Conidial concentration was quantified, and the inoculum suspension diluted to ~5 105 (+ 0.01% polysorbate-20)/ml. Five cv. Cascade plants were sprayed with inoculum until run-off and covered with a plastic bag for 72 h. Non-inoculated control plants were sprayed with 0.01% polysorbate-20 and bagged. Plants were placed in a misting chamber and exposed to alternating 25°C light/18°C dark with a 16 h photoperiod. Mist was applied for 1 h daily. Necrotic lesions like the field specimens were observed on all inoculated plants after 28 days with no symptoms on control plants. Diseased leaves were detached and placed in a humid chamber for 2 days, and pycnidia observed in lesions. The reisolation frequency of D. humulicola was 100%. Conidia from the isolates had similar morphology to the original isolates. This is the first report of halo blight caused by D. humulicola on hop in NY. Halo blight has been reported on hop and associated with significant yield loss through cone shattering in MI (Higgins et al. 2021), CT (Allan-Perkins et al. 2020), and Quebec, Canada (Hatlen et al. 2021). Research is needed to determine if management is warranted.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».