First Report of Halo Blight on Hop Caused by <i>Diaporthe humulicola</i> in New York
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In late July and August 2015, foliar disease was observed in three hop (Humulus lupulus; unknown cultivars) yards in Ontario, Otsego, and Putnam counties, New York (NY). Disease incidence ranged between 70 and 90% of plants, and up to 25% of the leaves per plant were affected. Leaf symptoms were large, necrotic patches with a chlorotic halo (2 to 10 cm diam.). Leaves and dry, easily shattered cones were placed at high humidity for 10 days. Pycnidia were abundant in leaf lesions which extruded conidia. Pycnidia were also observed on cone bracts and bracteoles. Fifteen isolations were made from each yard by placing a pycnidium onto 2% water agar + 0.02% (w/v) ampicillin. Colonies were hyphal tipped and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) before incubation at 20°C with a 12-h photoperiod. Colonies on PDA had flat mycelia and were white to cream in color. The isolation frequency was 100%. To induce sporulation, five isolates were grown on PDA with autoclaved alfalfa stems for 7 to 10 days. Alpha conidia were hyaline, and oval with obtuse ends. Mean alpha conidial dimensions were (n = 20): 9.1 m × 3.4 µm (BE1; Ontario Co.); 11.8 × 3.8 µm (BE34; Ontario Co.); 9.6 × 4.1 µm (BE10; Ontario Co.); 10.2 × 3.7 µm (BE52; Otsego Co.); and 10.3 × 3.6 µm (BE69; Putnam Co.). Beta conidia were not observed. DNA was extracted and PCR performed to amplify the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (primers ITS1/ITS4; White et al. 1990), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF; EF1-728F/EF1-986R; Carbone and Kohn 1999), a partial region of β-tubulin (TUB; Bt2a/Bt2b; Glass and Donaldson 1995), a partial region of histone 3 (H3) (H3; CYLH3F/H3-1b Crous et al. 2004), and calmodulin (CAL; CAL-228F/CAL2Rd; Groenewald et al. 2013) genes. For all NY isolates, sequence similarity was >99% to D. humulicola CT2018-3 for the ITS region, and TEF, HIS, and CAL genes. Sequence similarity to CT2018-3 for the TUB region ranged from 86.96% (BE-1) to 96.15% (BE-10). . Analyses with the ITS, TEF, CAL, and HIS sequences supported our identification of the NY isolates as D. humulicola. Sequences were deposited in GenBank (OM370960 to OM370984). For pathogenicity testing, BE-34 and BE-69 were grown on PDA + autoclaved alfalfa stems at room temperature and a 12-h photoperiod for 10 days. Conidia were harvested by flooding the plate with sterile water. Conidial concentration was quantified, and the inoculum suspension diluted to ~5 105 (+ 0.01% polysorbate-20)/ml. Five cv. Cascade plants were sprayed with inoculum until run-off and covered with a plastic bag for 72 h. Non-inoculated control plants were sprayed with 0.01% polysorbate-20 and bagged. Plants were placed in a misting chamber and exposed to alternating 25°C light/18°C dark with a 16 h photoperiod. Mist was applied for 1 h daily. Necrotic lesions like the field specimens were observed on all inoculated plants after 28 days with no symptoms on control plants. Diseased leaves were detached and placed in a humid chamber for 2 days, and pycnidia observed in lesions. The reisolation frequency of D. humulicola was 100%. Conidia from the isolates had similar morphology to the original isolates. This is the first report of halo blight caused by D. humulicola on hop in NY. Halo blight has been reported on hop and associated with significant yield loss through cone shattering in MI (Higgins et al. 2021), CT (Allan-Perkins et al. 2020), and Quebec, Canada (Hatlen et al. 2021). Research is needed to determine if management is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".