Abstract CT006: Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: ATR kinase is a critical component of DDR machinery and is activated by DNA damage or replication stress. Elimusertib is a selective ATR inhibitor with promising antitumor activity in pts with advanced solid tumors with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein loss and/or ATM putative deleterious alterations (Yap et al. Cancer Discov 2021). We report here the safety and efficacy of elimusertib in expansion cohorts of pts with a range of cancer types and DDR deficiencies and/or ATM loss. We also explored an alternative dose schedule in pts with ATM aberrations. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors resistant or refractory to standard treatment were screened for pathogenic DDR defects by next-generation sequencing or ATM protein loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of baseline tumor tissue. Pts were assigned to cohorts: colorectal cancer (CRC); castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); HER2− breast cancer (BC); gynecologic (GYN, mainly ovarian and endometrial); and advanced cancers with ATM IHC loss. Pts were treated with elimusertib 40 mg twice daily (BID) 3 days on/4 days off (3 on/4 off). A schedule of 3 on/11 off was also explored by dose escalation in pts with ATM loss or inactivating mutation. Results: 143 pts received ≥1 dose of elimusertib 40 mg BID 3 on/4 off, including 24 CRC, 19 CRPC, 19 BC, 45 GYN, and 36 ATM loss. 56% of pts had ≥4 prior therapy lines. Drug-related grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 69% and 15% of pts, respectively, mainly anemia, leukopenia/neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia leading to dose modification but not withdrawal. 32 pts were treated 3 on/11 off with doses from 60 to 120 mg BID. Compared with 3 on/4 off, drug-related grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs and dose modifications improved at lower doses, with 80 mg 3 on/11 off determined as the recommended dose. In pts receiving elimusertib 3 on/4 off, 5 RECIST partial responses were observed: 1 in ovarian (BRCA1 heterozygous mutation), 1 in BC (BRCA2 mutation), and 3 in ATM IHC loss: 2 CRPC pts both with ATM mutations (1 heterozygous, 1 homozygous), including 1 with FANCA mutation; 1 esophageal with ATM mutation. In pts with ATM IHC loss, objective response rate (ORR) was 9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 65%. A similar ORR was seen on 3 on/11 off in pts with ATM aberrations. In GYN pts, ORR was 2.3% and DCR was 73%. Conclusions: Elimusertib monotherapy demonstrated clinical activity in pts with DDR defects. Overall safety was manageable and hematologic toxicity improved on the 3 on/11 off schedule. Further biomarker analysis is underway to identify potential gene signatures associated with response. Clinical development of elimusertib in combination with checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy is ongoing (NCT04095273, NCT04514497). Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, David S. Tan, Anastasios Stathis, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Satoru Iwasa, Markus Joerger, Jingsong Zhang, Ruth Plummer, Michael Sawyer, Aaron C. Tan, Vincent Castonguay, Nashat Gabrail, Nobuaki Matsubara, Gary Wilkinson, Matthias Ludwig, Yinghui Zhou, Claudia Merz, Joseph Hreiki, Neelesh Sharma, Johan deBono. Phase Ib expansion trial of the safety and efficacy of the oral ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT006.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».