P13 Communicating needs and features of IBD experiences (CONFIDE) survey: patient and health care professional perspectives
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Introduction</h3> Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) aims to further understand the experience and impact of symptoms on patients’ (pts’) lives and elucidate any gaps in communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and pts with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) in the US, Europe, and Japan. These data focus on US UC pts and HCPs. <h3>Methods</h3> An online, quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted on HCPs (n=200) and pts with moderate-severe UC (using criteria from previous treatment experience, steroid use and/or hospitalization) (n=200) in the US between May (HCPs) and July (pts) 2021. The HCP survey included physicians (89%) and non-physician HCPs (11%) responsible for making prescribing decisions. <h3>Results</h3> The top 3 symptoms currently and ever suffered by pts (mean age: 40.4, 61.5% male) were diarrhea (62.5% and 74.0%), bowel urgency (47.0% and 61.5%), and increased stool frequency (38.5% and 57.5%). Blood in stool was reported by 27.0% pts as currently suffering, and 51.0% ever. Per HCPs (78.0% male), the top 3 pt-reported symptoms were diarrhea (73.5% ranked in top 3), blood in stool (69.0%), and increased stool frequency (37.5%). 24.0% HCPs reported bowel urgency in the top 3 pt-reported symptoms. Pts self-rated their disease severity as 10.5% (n=21) mild UC, 71.0% (n=142) moderate UC, 17.5% (n=35) severe UC, and not known 1.0% (n=2). Bowel urgency was more frequent with severe UC (62.9%, n=22) than mild-moderate UC (42.9%, n=70). 76.5% (n=153) pts were receiving advanced therapies; 46.4% currently experiencing bowel urgency. Only 38.2% pts felt comfortable reporting bowel urgency to their HCP, while 62.2% (n=23) reported feeling embarrassed talking about it. 75.5% (n=151) HCPs reported they proactively discussed bowel urgency at appointments. HCPs not proactively discussing bowel urgency (24.5%, n=49) expect the pt to bring it up (46.9%, n=23). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Bowel urgency is the second-most commonly reported symptom by moderate-severe UC pts, but is not among the HCP-perceived top 3. A substantial proportion of moderate-severe UC pts receiving advanced therapies continue to report bowel urgency. Communication gap between pts and HCPs was identified and highlights the under-appreciation of bowel urgency as an important symptom impacting pts’ daily life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle