S198: BET INHIBITOR PELABRESIB (CPI-0610) COMBINED WITH RUXOLITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH MYELOFIBROSIS — JAK INHIBITOR-NAÏVE OR WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESPONSE TO RUXOLITINIB — PRELIMINARY DATA FROM THE MANIFEST STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by bone marrow (BM) fibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Progressive BM fibrosis results from aberrant megakaryopoiesis and proinflammatory cytokine expression, two processes that are tightly regulated by bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) protein-mediated expression of genes (e.g. NF-κB, MYC and BCL-2) and often lead to myeloproliferation and cytopenias. While many MF patients (pts) receive the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) ruxolitinib (RUX) as the current standard of care, the depth and durability of responses, along with the percentage of pts that achieve ≥35% spleen volume reduction from baseline (BL; SVR35) and ≥50% total symptom score reduction from BL (TSS50) are limited; thus, a significant unmet medical need exists. Pelabresib (CPI-0610) is an oral, small-molecule, investigational BET inhibitor that downregulates NF-κB gene expression and other relevant genes involved in MF disease pathways. Aims: Data (Sep 2021 data cut) on the safety and efficacy of pelabresib in combination with RUX in pts with MF from Arms 2 and 3 of the ongoing, open-label Phase 2 MANIFEST study (NCT02158858). In Arm 2, MF pts with suboptimal response to RUX are treated with pelabresib as ‘add-on’ to RUX (Arm 2A: transfusion dependent [TD]; Arm 2B: non-TD). In Arm 3, JAKi-naïve MF pts are treated with pelabresib in combination with RUX. Methods: The primary endpoints are SVR35 at Week (Wk) 24 for Arm 3 and Arm 2B (non-TD cohort) and TD to transfusion independence (TI) in Arm 2A (TD cohort). The key secondary endpoint is TSS50 per Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v4.0 at Wk 24; in Arm 2A (TD cohort), SVR35 is an additional key secondary endpoint. BM biopsies to assess BM fibrosis and safety data are also evaluated. Results: At Wk 24 in Arm 3 (N=84), 68% (57/84) pts achieved SVR35 (median change: –50%; Figure), and 56% (46/82) pts achieved TSS50 (median change: –59%). Twenty-four percent of pts had a mean hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL from BL over 12 weeks without transfusions. At Wk 24 in Arm 2 (N=86), 20% (16/81) pts achieved SVR35 (median change: –18%; Figure), and 37% (30/81) pts achieved TSS50 (median change: –47%). In Arm 2A, the TD to TI rate was 16% (6/38). BM fibrosis improvement by ≥1 grade was achieved in 31% (16/52) and 25% (9/36) pts in Arm 3 and 2, respectively. Further central review and exploratory analyses of BM pathology from a more mature data set, including clinical correlations, will be presented. The most common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade was thrombocytopenia, reported in 52% (≥Grade 3: 12%) and 52% (≥Grade 3: 33%) pts in Arm 3 and 2, respectively. Anemia was reported in 42% (≥Grade 3: 35%) and 27% (≥Grade 3: 19%) pts in Arm 3 and 2, respectively. Low-grade gastrointestinal TEAEs and respiratory infections in Arm 3 and 2 were observed but rarely a reason for treatment discontinuation. Image:Summary/Conclusion: Based on these interim Phase 2 data, pelabresib in combination with RUX, in both RUX treatment-naïve and -experienced pts with MF, resulted in splenic and symptom responses and BM fibrosis improvement, and appeared to be well tolerated. Based on data from MANIFEST Arm 3, the randomized, double-blind, active-control Phase 3 MANIFEST-2 study was initiated to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib in JAKi treatment-naïve pts with MF (NCT04603495).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».