MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4283653146 · doi:10.32955/neu.istem.2022.8.1.06

Abū Manṣūr Al-Thaʿālibī and His Man Ghābe ‘Anhu’l-Muṭrib Named Book

2022· article· en· W4283653146 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabriye Mohammadı, Mohammad Mohammadi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal Of The Near East Unıversıty Islamıc Research Center · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryPeriod (music)IslamTurkishLiteratureArabicHistorySubject matterQuarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsArtLinguisticsPhilosophySociologyArchaeologyAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anthologies are the selections created by other representatives of their fields, in line with different purposes such as informing, educating, collecting, and storage authors or artists. As a matter of fact, this term has been associated with literature and especially poetry. Authors from both Turkish and Arabic literature have created poetry anthologies. The word "mecmua" also means the same, both of which mean to gather or to be gathered. The word mecmua is used in Arabic literature for anthologies. Abū Manṣūr al-Thaʿālibī appears before us as a man of letters in Arabic literature who produced works of this type. Thaʿālibī has a very important place in the Arabic language literature. As a matter of fact, even during his lifetime, his importance was noticed and his fame spread both in the East and in the West. Sealibi lived in a period that is accepted as the golden age of Islam. The period in which he lived exactly corresponds to the middle of the 4th century and the first quarter of the 5th century. This age, in which he grew up, made quite positive contributions to his scientific and literary personality. Due to the large number of the works, he wrote, the efficiency of the content and the comprehensiveness of the subjects, Thaʿālibī managed to attract the attention of scholars after his death, and he has made a name for himself especially in the field of Arabic language. As a matter of fact, Thaʿālibī was not only interested in the Arabic language and had a deep knowledge of it; He also came to the fore with his dominance in fields such as the science of criticism and the science of history. He has also accommodated works in these fields. It is possible to count Thaʿālibī's works named Yatimatu'd-Dahr, Fiqh al-luġa and Sirru'l-'Arabiyyah and Adab al-mulūk among the most famous of his works. However, despite all the positive circumstances, there is no satisfactory amount of information about Thaʿālibī's life, and the existing information is also self-repetitive. In this study, it is aimed to analyze Thaʿālibī's work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is an addendum to his poetry anthology called Ahsanu mā Sam‘itu, also known as Ahsanu'l-Mahāsin. In this work, Thaʿālibī writes from Ibn al-Muʿtazz (d. 296/908) to al-Mutanabbī (d. 354/965), from Abu ’l-Fatḥ al-Bustī (d. 400/1010), to al-Maʾmūn (d. 218/833) from Ṣāḥib b. ʿAbbād (d. 385/995) to al-Kindī (d. 252/866 [?]) he compiled the poems he collected from hundreds of poets. As he stated in the introduction of the work, while doing this, he aimed to choose the most beautiful and superior poems in terms of wording and meaning. As a matter of fact, this is a reference to the critic of Thaʿālibī. In addition, although the work is considered as a poetry anthology, it also contains quotations about prose. Five of the sixty or so titles he allocated are only about prose. Research; It consists of two parts, excluding the introduction and conclusion parts. In the first part, Thaʿālibī's life and works, in the second part, his work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is the main subject of the study, has been examined in terms of form and content, and the poems handled by him in the work have been evaluated in terms of their literary arts.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,071
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,360
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal Of The Near East Unıversıty Islamıc Research CenterMême sujetFamilies in Therapy and CultureTravaux en français237 207