Abū Manṣūr Al-Thaʿālibī and His Man Ghābe ‘Anhu’l-Muṭrib Named Book
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthologies are the selections created by other representatives of their fields, in line with different purposes such as informing, educating, collecting, and storage authors or artists. As a matter of fact, this term has been associated with literature and especially poetry. Authors from both Turkish and Arabic literature have created poetry anthologies. The word "mecmua" also means the same, both of which mean to gather or to be gathered. The word mecmua is used in Arabic literature for anthologies. Abū Manṣūr al-Thaʿālibī appears before us as a man of letters in Arabic literature who produced works of this type. Thaʿālibī has a very important place in the Arabic language literature. As a matter of fact, even during his lifetime, his importance was noticed and his fame spread both in the East and in the West. Sealibi lived in a period that is accepted as the golden age of Islam. The period in which he lived exactly corresponds to the middle of the 4th century and the first quarter of the 5th century. This age, in which he grew up, made quite positive contributions to his scientific and literary personality. Due to the large number of the works, he wrote, the efficiency of the content and the comprehensiveness of the subjects, Thaʿālibī managed to attract the attention of scholars after his death, and he has made a name for himself especially in the field of Arabic language. As a matter of fact, Thaʿālibī was not only interested in the Arabic language and had a deep knowledge of it; He also came to the fore with his dominance in fields such as the science of criticism and the science of history. He has also accommodated works in these fields. It is possible to count Thaʿālibī's works named Yatimatu'd-Dahr, Fiqh al-luġa and Sirru'l-'Arabiyyah and Adab al-mulūk among the most famous of his works. However, despite all the positive circumstances, there is no satisfactory amount of information about Thaʿālibī's life, and the existing information is also self-repetitive. In this study, it is aimed to analyze Thaʿālibī's work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is an addendum to his poetry anthology called Ahsanu mā Sam‘itu, also known as Ahsanu'l-Mahāsin. In this work, Thaʿālibī writes from Ibn al-Muʿtazz (d. 296/908) to al-Mutanabbī (d. 354/965), from Abu ’l-Fatḥ al-Bustī (d. 400/1010), to al-Maʾmūn (d. 218/833) from Ṣāḥib b. ʿAbbād (d. 385/995) to al-Kindī (d. 252/866 [?]) he compiled the poems he collected from hundreds of poets. As he stated in the introduction of the work, while doing this, he aimed to choose the most beautiful and superior poems in terms of wording and meaning. As a matter of fact, this is a reference to the critic of Thaʿālibī. In addition, although the work is considered as a poetry anthology, it also contains quotations about prose. Five of the sixty or so titles he allocated are only about prose. Research; It consists of two parts, excluding the introduction and conclusion parts. In the first part, Thaʿālibī's life and works, in the second part, his work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is the main subject of the study, has been examined in terms of form and content, and the poems handled by him in the work have been evaluated in terms of their literary arts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".