MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abū Manṣūr Al-Thaʿālibī and His Man Ghābe ‘Anhu’l-Muṭrib Named Book

2022· article· en· W4283653146 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabriye Mohammadı, Mohammad Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of The Near East Unıversıty Islamıc Research Center · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPeriod (music)IslamTurkishLiteratureArabicHistorySubject matterQuarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsArtLinguisticsPhilosophySociologyArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthologies are the selections created by other representatives of their fields, in line with different purposes such as informing, educating, collecting, and storage authors or artists. As a matter of fact, this term has been associated with literature and especially poetry. Authors from both Turkish and Arabic literature have created poetry anthologies. The word "mecmua" also means the same, both of which mean to gather or to be gathered. The word mecmua is used in Arabic literature for anthologies. Abū Manṣūr al-Thaʿālibī appears before us as a man of letters in Arabic literature who produced works of this type. Thaʿālibī has a very important place in the Arabic language literature. As a matter of fact, even during his lifetime, his importance was noticed and his fame spread both in the East and in the West. Sealibi lived in a period that is accepted as the golden age of Islam. The period in which he lived exactly corresponds to the middle of the 4th century and the first quarter of the 5th century. This age, in which he grew up, made quite positive contributions to his scientific and literary personality. Due to the large number of the works, he wrote, the efficiency of the content and the comprehensiveness of the subjects, Thaʿālibī managed to attract the attention of scholars after his death, and he has made a name for himself especially in the field of Arabic language. As a matter of fact, Thaʿālibī was not only interested in the Arabic language and had a deep knowledge of it; He also came to the fore with his dominance in fields such as the science of criticism and the science of history. He has also accommodated works in these fields. It is possible to count Thaʿālibī's works named Yatimatu'd-Dahr, Fiqh al-luġa and Sirru'l-'Arabiyyah and Adab al-mulūk among the most famous of his works. However, despite all the positive circumstances, there is no satisfactory amount of information about Thaʿālibī's life, and the existing information is also self-repetitive. In this study, it is aimed to analyze Thaʿālibī's work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is an addendum to his poetry anthology called Ahsanu mā Sam‘itu, also known as Ahsanu'l-Mahāsin. In this work, Thaʿālibī writes from Ibn al-Muʿtazz (d. 296/908) to al-Mutanabbī (d. 354/965), from Abu ’l-Fatḥ al-Bustī (d. 400/1010), to al-Maʾmūn (d. 218/833) from Ṣāḥib b. ʿAbbād (d. 385/995) to al-Kindī (d. 252/866 [?]) he compiled the poems he collected from hundreds of poets. As he stated in the introduction of the work, while doing this, he aimed to choose the most beautiful and superior poems in terms of wording and meaning. As a matter of fact, this is a reference to the critic of Thaʿālibī. In addition, although the work is considered as a poetry anthology, it also contains quotations about prose. Five of the sixty or so titles he allocated are only about prose. Research; It consists of two parts, excluding the introduction and conclusion parts. In the first part, Thaʿālibī's life and works, in the second part, his work named Man Ghābe ‘anhu’l-Muṭrib, which is the main subject of the study, has been examined in terms of form and content, and the poems handled by him in the work have been evaluated in terms of their literary arts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Of The Near East Unıversıty Islamıc Research CenterSame topicFamilies in Therapy and CultureFrench-language works237,207