P-549 Paraclinical and spermogram evaluation of infertile males with balanced chromosomal rearrangements referred to Royan institute from 2009-2021
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question Whether balanced chromosomal rearrangements are associated with altered semen parameters/increased DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI), are the common breakpoints related to male infertility in patients ? Summary answer Balanced chromosomal rearrangements is associated with abnormal semen parameters and increased DFI in carriers. Chromosomes 9,1,3 showed the highest incidence of chromosomal rearrangement What is known already Among many factors, balanced chromosomal rearrangements are thought to be one of the major genetic factors influencing male infertility which can cause disorders related to spermogram, DNA fragmentation, increased risk of miscarriage and ART failure. Finding common chromosomal breakpoints in infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal translocations is significant since these patients usually possess normal clinical features. Numerous studies have been performed on the various chromosome translocations. However, there has not been any report on the common breakpoints in balanced chromosomal abnormalities related to male infertility in Iran. Study design, size, duration This cross-sectional study performed on 25000 patients’ files admitted to the Royan institute during the period 2009- 2021.Infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal rearrangements were included as case group. Sperm parameters, DFI and common chromosomal break points were evaluated Participants/materials, setting, methods 25000 files of patients were reviewed. 252 infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal rearrangements and 252 men with normal karyotype were included (case and control group, respectively). Sperm concentration, motility (CASA), sperm morphology (Papanicolaou Staining),DFI (SCSA) and cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes (G-banding) were evaluated. Numerical chromosomal abnormalities, deletions, marker chromosomes, alcohol or drug addiction, smoking, chemotherapy and radiation, varicocele and exposure to environmental pollution were excluded. The common chromosomal breakpoints in translocations were investigated. Main results and the role of chance Sperm concentration, total motility and normal morphology were significantly lower in balanced chromosomal rearrangements carriers compared to control group(p < 0.05). DFI in patient was significantly higher in comparison to control group(p < 0.05). Among different kind of chromosomal rearrangement carriers’, sperm concentration and total motility were lower in Robertsonian translocation carriers comparing to the Reciprocal translocation and inversion ones. The reciprocal translocation and inversion carriers did not differ regarding to sperm concentration and total motility. Meanwhile, normal morphology was lower in the translocation compared to inversion carriers. No difference was observed in DFI among carriers of balanced chromosomal rearrangements. Among case group, inversion accounted for the largest share, followed by Reciprocal, Robertsonian translocation and insertion. Group C had the highest frequency in reciprocal translocation, inversion and insertion among the chromosomal groups. The highest balanced translocation prevalence was related to three chromosomes 9,3, and1. 9q12,1p36,3p11 were the most frequent breakpoints among them. Chromosome 9 had the largest contribution to inversions,22 to reciprocal translocations and14 to Robertsonian translocations. In the Robertsonian translocation, group D showed the highest frequency. Interestingly, patients carrying normal variations such as pericentric inversion of chromosome 9showed a significant alteration in sperm parameters, therefore normal variations showed a possible relationship to infertility. Limitations, reasons for caution In order to achieve stronger statistical results on DFI, a larger sample size would be more helpful. Wider implications of the findings The results may be useful to identify the most common breakpoints and consequently genes related to male infertility and can suggest appropriate molecular mechanism for their infertility. Trial registration number not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».