MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283724605 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deac107.507

P-549 Paraclinical and spermogram evaluation of infertile males with balanced chromosomal rearrangements referred to Royan institute from 2009-2021

2022· article· en· W4283724605 on OpenAlexaff
M Sabaghian, Melika Hossein Garakani, Sayed‐Rzgar Hosseini, Nasrin Motamed, Vahideh Hassan‐Zadeh, Naser Masoudi, Azadeh Ghaheri, Maryam Shahhoseini, Mohammadreza Zamanian, Anahita Mohseni Meybodi, Shokufeh Moradi

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal translocationInfertilityChromosomal rearrangementMale infertilitySperm bankKaryotypeSemenBiologySemen analysisSpermGeneticsChromosomeAndrologyMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Whether balanced chromosomal rearrangements are associated with altered semen parameters/increased DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI), are the common breakpoints related to male infertility in patients ? Summary answer Balanced chromosomal rearrangements is associated with abnormal semen parameters and increased DFI in carriers. Chromosomes 9,1,3 showed the highest incidence of chromosomal rearrangement What is known already Among many factors, balanced chromosomal rearrangements are thought to be one of the major genetic factors influencing male infertility which can cause disorders related to spermogram, DNA fragmentation, increased risk of miscarriage and ART failure. Finding common chromosomal breakpoints in infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal translocations is significant since these patients usually possess normal clinical features. Numerous studies have been performed on the various chromosome translocations. However, there has not been any report on the common breakpoints in balanced chromosomal abnormalities related to male infertility in Iran. Study design, size, duration This cross-sectional study performed on 25000 patients’ files admitted to the Royan institute during the period 2009- 2021.Infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal rearrangements were included as case group. Sperm parameters, DFI and common chromosomal break points were evaluated Participants/materials, setting, methods 25000 files of patients were reviewed. 252 infertile men carrying balanced chromosomal rearrangements and 252 men with normal karyotype were included (case and control group, respectively). Sperm concentration, motility (CASA), sperm morphology (Papanicolaou Staining),DFI (SCSA) and cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes (G-banding) were evaluated. Numerical chromosomal abnormalities, deletions, marker chromosomes, alcohol or drug addiction, smoking, chemotherapy and radiation, varicocele and exposure to environmental pollution were excluded. The common chromosomal breakpoints in translocations were investigated. Main results and the role of chance Sperm concentration, total motility and normal morphology were significantly lower in balanced chromosomal rearrangements carriers compared to control group(p < 0.05). DFI in patient was significantly higher in comparison to control group(p < 0.05). Among different kind of chromosomal rearrangement carriers’, sperm concentration and total motility were lower in Robertsonian translocation carriers comparing to the Reciprocal translocation and inversion ones. The reciprocal translocation and inversion carriers did not differ regarding to sperm concentration and total motility. Meanwhile, normal morphology was lower in the translocation compared to inversion carriers. No difference was observed in DFI among carriers of balanced chromosomal rearrangements. Among case group, inversion accounted for the largest share, followed by Reciprocal, Robertsonian translocation and insertion. Group C had the highest frequency in reciprocal translocation, inversion and insertion among the chromosomal groups. The highest balanced translocation prevalence was related to three chromosomes 9,3, and1. 9q12,1p36,3p11 were the most frequent breakpoints among them. Chromosome 9 had the largest contribution to inversions,22 to reciprocal translocations and14 to Robertsonian translocations. In the Robertsonian translocation, group D showed the highest frequency. Interestingly, patients carrying normal variations such as pericentric inversion of chromosome 9showed a significant alteration in sperm parameters, therefore normal variations showed a possible relationship to infertility. Limitations, reasons for caution In order to achieve stronger statistical results on DFI, a larger sample size would be more helpful. Wider implications of the findings The results may be useful to identify the most common breakpoints and consequently genes related to male infertility and can suggest appropriate molecular mechanism for their infertility. Trial registration number not applicable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207