MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4285094441 · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac805b

Glacial isostatic adjustment: physical models and observational constraints

2022· review· en· W4285094441 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueReports on Progress in Physics · 2022
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhysicsMantle (geology)PlanetGeophysicsMantle convectionConvectionGlacial periodPhenomenology (philosophy)GeologyMechanicsAstronomySeismologyTectonicsPaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract By far the most prescient insights into the interior structure of the planet have been provided on the basis of elastic wave seismology. Analysis of the travel times of shear or compression wave phases excited by individual earthquakes, or through analysis of the elastic gravitational free oscillations that individual earthquakes of sufficiently large magnitude may excite, has been the central focus of Earth physics research for more than a century. Unfortunately, data provide no information that is directly relevant to understanding the solid state ‘flow’ of the polycrystalline outer ‘mantle’ shell of the planet that is involved in the thermally driven convective circulation that is responsible for powering the ‘drift’ of the continents and which controls the rate of planetary cooling on long timescales. For this reason, there has been an increasing focus on the understanding of physical phenomenology that is unambiguously associated with mantle flow processes that are distinct from those directly associated with the convective circulation itself. This paper reviews the past many decades of work that has been invested in understanding the most important of such processes, namely that which has come to be referred to as ‘glacial isostatic adjustment’ (GIA). This process concerns the response of the planet to the loading and unloading of the high latitude continents by the massive accumulations of glacial ice that have occurred with almost metronomic regularity over the most recent million years of Earth history. Forced by the impact of gravitational n -body effects on the geometry of Earth’s orbit around the Sun through the impact upon the terrestrial regime of received solar insolation, these surface mass loads on the continents have left indelible records of their occurrence in the ‘Earth system’ consisting of the oceans, continents, and the great polar ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica themselves. Although this ice-age phenomenology has been clearly recognized since early in the last century, it was for over 50 years considered to be no more than an interesting curiosity, the understanding of which remained on the periphery of the theoretical physics of the Earth. This was the case in part because no globally applicable theory was available that could be applied to rigorously interpret the observations. Equally important to understanding the scientific lethargy that held back the understanding of this phenomenon involving mantle flow processes was the lack of appreciation of the wide range of observations that were in fact related to GIA physics. This paper is devoted to a review of the global theories of the GIA process that have since been developed as a means of interpreting the extensive variety of observations that are now recognized as being involved in the response of the planet to the loading and unloading of its surface by glacial ice. The paper will also provide examples of the further analyses of Earth physics and climate related processes that applications of the modern theoretical structures have enabled.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,992
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,096
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle