MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285094441 · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac805b

Glacial isostatic adjustment: physical models and observational constraints

2022· review· en· W4285094441 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReports on Progress in Physics · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMantle (geology)PlanetGeophysicsMantle convectionConvectionGlacial periodPhenomenology (philosophy)GeologyMechanicsAstronomySeismologyTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract By far the most prescient insights into the interior structure of the planet have been provided on the basis of elastic wave seismology. Analysis of the travel times of shear or compression wave phases excited by individual earthquakes, or through analysis of the elastic gravitational free oscillations that individual earthquakes of sufficiently large magnitude may excite, has been the central focus of Earth physics research for more than a century. Unfortunately, data provide no information that is directly relevant to understanding the solid state ‘flow’ of the polycrystalline outer ‘mantle’ shell of the planet that is involved in the thermally driven convective circulation that is responsible for powering the ‘drift’ of the continents and which controls the rate of planetary cooling on long timescales. For this reason, there has been an increasing focus on the understanding of physical phenomenology that is unambiguously associated with mantle flow processes that are distinct from those directly associated with the convective circulation itself. This paper reviews the past many decades of work that has been invested in understanding the most important of such processes, namely that which has come to be referred to as ‘glacial isostatic adjustment’ (GIA). This process concerns the response of the planet to the loading and unloading of the high latitude continents by the massive accumulations of glacial ice that have occurred with almost metronomic regularity over the most recent million years of Earth history. Forced by the impact of gravitational n -body effects on the geometry of Earth’s orbit around the Sun through the impact upon the terrestrial regime of received solar insolation, these surface mass loads on the continents have left indelible records of their occurrence in the ‘Earth system’ consisting of the oceans, continents, and the great polar ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica themselves. Although this ice-age phenomenology has been clearly recognized since early in the last century, it was for over 50 years considered to be no more than an interesting curiosity, the understanding of which remained on the periphery of the theoretical physics of the Earth. This was the case in part because no globally applicable theory was available that could be applied to rigorously interpret the observations. Equally important to understanding the scientific lethargy that held back the understanding of this phenomenon involving mantle flow processes was the lack of appreciation of the wide range of observations that were in fact related to GIA physics. This paper is devoted to a review of the global theories of the GIA process that have since been developed as a means of interpreting the extensive variety of observations that are now recognized as being involved in the response of the planet to the loading and unloading of its surface by glacial ice. The paper will also provide examples of the further analyses of Earth physics and climate related processes that applications of the modern theoretical structures have enabled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it