Commentary: Thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy—small but tricky
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageThis article is a good resource for trainees to gain a better understanding of minimally invasive right middle lobectomy.See Article page 130. This article is a good resource for trainees to gain a better understanding of minimally invasive right middle lobectomy. See Article page 130. As far as we are aware, there are many possible sequences of steps to complete a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lung resection without any clear demonstration of superiority from one to another. It is nevertheless important for trainees and mentors alike to develop a structured approach upon which to rely, especially when it comes to the right middle lobe, which harbors malignancy in only 5% to 7% of patients.1Allen M.S. Darling G.E. Pechet T.T. Mitchell J.D. Herndon II, J.E. Landreneau R.J. et al.Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 1013-1020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.066Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (539) Google Scholar, 2Miura H. Kato H. Konaka C. Usuda J. Uchida O. Taira O. Primary lung cancer of the middle lobe. Is its prognosis poor?.Lung Cancer. 1996; 14: 273-279Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, 3Mazza F. Ferrari E. Maineri P. Venturino M. Dozin B. Ratto G.B. Pulmonary middle lobectomy for non–small-cell lung cancer: effectiveness and prognostic implications.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 48: e117-e123PubMed Google Scholar, 4Handa Y. Tsutani Y. Ikeda T. Hanaki H. Miyata Y. Mukaida H. et al.Reassessment of right middle lobe lung cancer: comparison of segments 4 and 5 tumors.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1543-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar Primary lung cancer of the right middle lobe is associated with a poorer prognosis, presumably because most of its lymphatic network drains directly into mediastinal lymph nodes.4Handa Y. Tsutani Y. Ikeda T. Hanaki H. Miyata Y. Mukaida H. et al.Reassessment of right middle lobe lung cancer: comparison of segments 4 and 5 tumors.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1543-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar, 5Peleg H. Antkowiak J.G. Lane W.W. Regal A.M. Takita H. Prognosis after resection of non-small cell lung cancer of the right middle lobe.J Surg Oncol. 1987; 35: 230-234Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar, 6Bedini A.V. Cataldo I. Valente M. Alloisio M. Pastorino U. Ravasi G. Surgical prognosis in stage I bronchogenic carcinoma of the middle lobe.Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 23: 283-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar This is part of the rationale to recommend lobectomy rather than sublobar resection for a right middle lobe primary lung cancer.7Lv X. Cao J. Dai X. Rusidanmu A. Survival rates after lobectomy versus sublobar resection for early-stage right middle lobe non–small cell lung cancer: surgery for middle lobe lung cancer.Thorac Cancer. 2018; 9: 1026-1031https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12782Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar The anatomy of the right middle lobe is somewhat unique in that it shares its vein with the upper lobe and its bronchus with the lower lobe. In their description, Polhemus and colleagues8Polhemus E.L. Dolan D.P. Lee D.N. Khalil H.A. White A.A. Swanson S.J. How I do it: multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery of the right middle lobe for non–small cell lung cancer: right middle lobectomy in 12 steps.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2022; 14: 130-135Scopus (1) Google Scholar summarize their right middle lobectomy approach in 12 steps, which are easy to follow and understand. Alternate approaches for certain steps are also described in the text as a mean of addressing difficult or unusual anatomy. Unfortunately, a limitation to this article is that different approaches to right middle lobectomy were not mentioned, such as the fissure first approach or the uniportal approach. Awareness of different approaches to the same operation may better equip surgeons to adapt their strategy to unexpected intraoperative findings and achieve excellent outcomes despite atypical anatomy and oncologic challenges. Technical essays will provide our community with an up-to-date, stepwise, methodic approaches to right middle lobectomy. This contribution and others will become key as we enter the era of competency-based postgraduate surgical training. This contribution from Polhemus and colleagues will hopefully assist program directors and educators in developing entrusted professional activities and milestones relevant to surgical trainees pursuing competence and excellence pulmonary resection. We hope this manuscript will serve as an ongoing educational resource to thoracic surgical trainees and that it will help them develop a systematic approach to resection of the right middle lobe and, along with other aspects of surgical training, enable them to perform a right middle lobectomy safely. How I do it: Multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery of the right middle lobe for non–small cell lung cancer: Right middle lobectomy in 12 stepsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 14PreviewRight middle lobe (RML) lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the least commonly performed lobectomy at 5% to 10%.1,2 RML lobectomy is not infrequently performed as a bilobectomy if tumors are located close to the RML anatomy and right upper or lower lobectomy alone is not feasible. Sublobar resection of the RML for small NSCLC is feasible but has worse outcomes as tumor size increases.3 Current randomized trials are ongoing to prospectively evaluate these retrospective findings.4 Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».