Commentary: Thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy—small but tricky
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central MessageThis article is a good resource for trainees to gain a better understanding of minimally invasive right middle lobectomy.See Article page 130. This article is a good resource for trainees to gain a better understanding of minimally invasive right middle lobectomy. See Article page 130. As far as we are aware, there are many possible sequences of steps to complete a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lung resection without any clear demonstration of superiority from one to another. It is nevertheless important for trainees and mentors alike to develop a structured approach upon which to rely, especially when it comes to the right middle lobe, which harbors malignancy in only 5% to 7% of patients.1Allen M.S. Darling G.E. Pechet T.T. Mitchell J.D. Herndon II, J.E. Landreneau R.J. et al.Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 1013-1020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.066Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (539) Google Scholar, 2Miura H. Kato H. Konaka C. Usuda J. Uchida O. Taira O. Primary lung cancer of the middle lobe. Is its prognosis poor?.Lung Cancer. 1996; 14: 273-279Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, 3Mazza F. Ferrari E. Maineri P. Venturino M. Dozin B. Ratto G.B. Pulmonary middle lobectomy for non–small-cell lung cancer: effectiveness and prognostic implications.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 48: e117-e123PubMed Google Scholar, 4Handa Y. Tsutani Y. Ikeda T. Hanaki H. Miyata Y. Mukaida H. et al.Reassessment of right middle lobe lung cancer: comparison of segments 4 and 5 tumors.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1543-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar Primary lung cancer of the right middle lobe is associated with a poorer prognosis, presumably because most of its lymphatic network drains directly into mediastinal lymph nodes.4Handa Y. Tsutani Y. Ikeda T. Hanaki H. Miyata Y. Mukaida H. et al.Reassessment of right middle lobe lung cancer: comparison of segments 4 and 5 tumors.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1543-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar, 5Peleg H. Antkowiak J.G. Lane W.W. Regal A.M. Takita H. Prognosis after resection of non-small cell lung cancer of the right middle lobe.J Surg Oncol. 1987; 35: 230-234Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar, 6Bedini A.V. Cataldo I. Valente M. Alloisio M. Pastorino U. Ravasi G. Surgical prognosis in stage I bronchogenic carcinoma of the middle lobe.Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 23: 283-284Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar This is part of the rationale to recommend lobectomy rather than sublobar resection for a right middle lobe primary lung cancer.7Lv X. Cao J. Dai X. Rusidanmu A. Survival rates after lobectomy versus sublobar resection for early-stage right middle lobe non–small cell lung cancer: surgery for middle lobe lung cancer.Thorac Cancer. 2018; 9: 1026-1031https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12782Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar The anatomy of the right middle lobe is somewhat unique in that it shares its vein with the upper lobe and its bronchus with the lower lobe. In their description, Polhemus and colleagues8Polhemus E.L. Dolan D.P. Lee D.N. Khalil H.A. White A.A. Swanson S.J. How I do it: multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery of the right middle lobe for non–small cell lung cancer: right middle lobectomy in 12 steps.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2022; 14: 130-135Scopus (1) Google Scholar summarize their right middle lobectomy approach in 12 steps, which are easy to follow and understand. Alternate approaches for certain steps are also described in the text as a mean of addressing difficult or unusual anatomy. Unfortunately, a limitation to this article is that different approaches to right middle lobectomy were not mentioned, such as the fissure first approach or the uniportal approach. Awareness of different approaches to the same operation may better equip surgeons to adapt their strategy to unexpected intraoperative findings and achieve excellent outcomes despite atypical anatomy and oncologic challenges. Technical essays will provide our community with an up-to-date, stepwise, methodic approaches to right middle lobectomy. This contribution and others will become key as we enter the era of competency-based postgraduate surgical training. This contribution from Polhemus and colleagues will hopefully assist program directors and educators in developing entrusted professional activities and milestones relevant to surgical trainees pursuing competence and excellence pulmonary resection. We hope this manuscript will serve as an ongoing educational resource to thoracic surgical trainees and that it will help them develop a systematic approach to resection of the right middle lobe and, along with other aspects of surgical training, enable them to perform a right middle lobectomy safely. How I do it: Multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery of the right middle lobe for non–small cell lung cancer: Right middle lobectomy in 12 stepsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 14PreviewRight middle lobe (RML) lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the least commonly performed lobectomy at 5% to 10%.1,2 RML lobectomy is not infrequently performed as a bilobectomy if tumors are located close to the RML anatomy and right upper or lower lobectomy alone is not feasible. Sublobar resection of the RML for small NSCLC is feasible but has worse outcomes as tumor size increases.3 Current randomized trials are ongoing to prospectively evaluate these retrospective findings.4 Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".