Fel d 1 surface expression on plant‐made <i>e</i>Bioparticles combines potent immune activation and hypoallergenicity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor, Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) still remains the only disease-modifying treatment for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergies with proven sustained efficacy upon discontinuation of the treatment, provided it is administered regularly for at least 3 years. Aluminum salts still remain a common depot and adjuvant for subcutaneous AIT that moderately reduce allergenicity; however, the risk of severe allergic reactions persists, making careful updosing protocols necessary.1 These characteristics justify the need for shorter treatments with improved safety profiles. Here, we describe plant-made enveloped eBioparticles (eBPs) surface-displaying high-density recombinant allergen as a novel AIT platform (Appendix S1). Previous in vivo experiments indicate that this eBP platform induces a robust protective IgG response more potently than the alum-adsorbed allergen.2 In this study, we assessed immunogenicity and allergenicity of eBPs displaying the major cat allergen Fel d 1 in a human in vitro setting. As dendritic cells are the most potent inducers and orchestrators of immune responses, we treated human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) with equivalent concentrations of soluble natural and recombinant, alum-adsorbed natural, and eBP-displayed recombinant Fel d 1. In contrast to soluble and alum-adsorbed Fel d 1, eBP presentation significantly upregulated the DC surface activation markers CD80, CD83, and CD86 already at low concentrations (1 μg/ml, Figure 1A). In line with these results, only stimulation with Fel d 1-displaying eBPs induced a potent production of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and IL-12p70 (Figure 1B). Our data therefore strongly suggest that plant-derived eBPs are efficient immune activators. Immune-stimulatory properties are required to reprogram the allergic T-helper-cell type 2 (Th2) response. The observed IL-10 and IL-12 responses may hence contribute to the rapid establishment of an allergen-specific mixed Th1/Treg response. Even though the mechanism of the immune-stimulatory properties remains speculative, it appears likely that high-density allergen presentation results in better crosslinking of DC surface receptors accompanied by preferential uptake due to the particulate presentation. Furthermore, we assessed the allergenicity of the eBPs by measuring β-hexosaminidase secretion of rat basophil leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells presensitized with human IgE from Fel d 1-sensitized patients. Soluble plant-produced recombinant Fel d 1 induced basophil degranulation in a comparable concentration range as observed for Fel d 1 in cat dander extract, demonstrating that the recombinant allergen is a good mimic of the native protein (Figure 2A). By contrast, >400-fold and 60-fold higher median Fel d 1 concentration on the eBPs were needed to trigger half maximum β-hexosaminidase release, compared with soluble recombinant Fel d 1 and alum-adsorbed natural Fel d 1, respectively (Figure 2B). To establish the importance of eBP structure for hypoallergenicity, we purposely maltreated the eBPs by a combination of vortexing and sonication. The treatment resulted in >5-fold increased allergenicity compared with intact eBPs, highlighting a significant involvement of the particulate 3D ultrastructure in the hypoallergenic properties (Figure 2C). These data demonstrate that multivalent high-density presentation of Fel d 1 on eBPs potently reduces allergenicity, not only compared with soluble but also with alum-adsorbed Fel d 1. Earlier publications based on virus-like particles displaying allergens have reported similar hypoallergenic outcomes for 3D allergen presentation.3, 4 Physical and biochemical aspects of repetitive surface distribution and resulting changes in allergen accessibility might serve as a possible explanation for the observed hypoallergenic outcome. While repetitively displayed allergens appear to have an inhibitory effect on basophils and mast cells, B-cell responses can still be triggered.3, 5 Based on the current and previous findings, plant-derived eBPs are promising AIT candidates showing enhanced immunogenicity in the absence of anaphylaxis. The endogenous adjuvant properties of in vivo-assembled plant eBPs may harbor the potential to make updosing protocols obsolete and instead facilitate high-dose prime-boost approaches. S. Busold, L. Aglas, C. Menage, and M. Stigler contributed to this study by designing the experiments and acquiring, interpreting, and analyzing the data. L. Auger, R. Desgagnés, L. Faye, A.-C. Fitchette, C. Martel, V. Catala-Stordeur, G. Tropper, L.-P. Vézina, and V. Gomord contributed to the concept design, development, or manufacturing of the plant-derived bioparticles platform. S. Busold, L. Aglas, V. Gomord, T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, and R. van Ree wrote, revised, and edited the manuscript. E. C. de Jong, T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, and R. van Ree supervised the study. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript. The authors thank Jakob Andreas Wagner and Markus Klotz for their contribution to the experimental procedure and Fatima Ferreira for critically reviewing the manuscript. We are furthermore grateful for the support obtained from the DC4Balance consortium. This project is embedded in the DC4Balance consortium, which was supported by Health Holland. The work of the authors has further been supported by Angany Inc. (Quebec, Canada), the Austrian Science Funds (Projects P32189), and the University of Salzburg priority program “Allergy-Cancer-BioNano Research Centre.” Stefanie Busold and Charlotte Menage received contract research funding and study material from Angany Inc. and the DC4Balance consortium. Lorenz Aglas and Maria Stigler received contract research funding and study material from Angany Inc. Louis-P Vézina is a cofounder, board member, and CEO of Angany Inc. Lydia Auger, Réjean Desgagnés, Loïc Faye, Anne-Catherine Fitchette, Caroline Martel, Virginie Stordeur, Guy Tropper, and Véronique Gomord are employees of Angany Inc. Esther C. de Jong and Teunis B. H. Geijtenbeek received funding from the DC4Balance consortium. Ronald van Ree received contract research funding and research material from Angany Inc. and the DC4Balance consortium and besides received consulting fees and/or speaker's fees from Angany Inc., HAL Allergy BV, and Citeq BV, ThermoFisher Scientific, Reacta Healthcare Ltd., Mission MightyMe, and AB Enzymes and has stock options from Angany Inc. Research data are not shared. Appendix S1 Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».