MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4291019306 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32095-5

Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistani and Bangladeshi individuals

2022· article· en· W4291019306 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Qin Qin Huang, Neneh Sallah, Diana Dunca, Bhavi Trivedi, Karen A. Hunt, Sam Hodgson, Samuel A. Lambert, Elena Arciero, John Wright, Chris Griffiths, Richard C. Trembath, Harry Hemingway, Michael Inouye, Sarah Finer, David A. van Heel, R Thomas Lumbers, Hilary C. Martin, Karoline Kuchenbaecker

Notice bibliographique

RevueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of Health and Social CareMedical Research CouncilScottish GovernmentChief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care DirectorateHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammePublic Health EnglandBarts Health NHS TrustPublic Health AgencyHealth and Social Care Research and Development DivisionNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchKing's College LondonEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationBritish Heart FoundationBarts CharityWellcomeHigher Education Funding Council for EnglandEconomic and Social Research CouncilEuropean CommissionBroad InstituteWellcome TrustCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInnovative Medicines Initiative
Mots-clésTransferabilityQuantitative trait locusMedicineGenome-wide association studyMendelian randomizationCohortDiseaseFramingham Risk ScoreGeneticsDemographySingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyGeneInternal medicineGenetic variantsGenotypeHuman capital

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Individuals with South Asian ancestry have higher risk of heart disease than other groups in Western countries; however, most genetic research has focused on European-ancestry (EUR) individuals. It is unknown whether reported genetic loci and polygenic scores (PGSs) for cardiometabolic traits are transferable to South Asians, and whether PGSs have utility in clinical settings. Methods Using data from 22,000 British Pakistani and Bangladeshi individuals with linked electronic health records from the Genes & Health cohort (G&H), we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and characterised the genetic architecture of coronary artery disease (CAD), body mass index (BMI), lipid biomarkers and blood pressure. We applied a new technique to assess the extent to which loci from GWAS in EUR samples were transferable. We tested how well existing findings from EUR studies performed in genetic risk prediction and Mendelian randomisation in G&H. Results Trans-ancestry genetic correlations between G&H and EUR samples for the tested traits were not significantly lower than 1, except for BMI (r g =0.85, p=0.02). We found evidence for transferability for the vast majority of loci from EUR discovery studies that were sufficiently powered to replicate in G&H. PGSs showed variable transferability in G&H, with the relative accuracy compared to EUR (ratio of incremental r 2 /AUC) ≥0.95 for HDL-C, triglycerides, and blood pressure, but lower for BMI (0.78) and CAD (0.42). We observed significant improvement in categorical net reclassification in G&H (NRI=3.9%; 95% CI 0.9–7.0) when adding a previously developed CAD PGS to clinical risk factors (QRISK3). We used transferable loci as genetic instruments in trans-ancestry Mendelian randomisation and found evidence of an increased CAD risk for higher LDL-C and BMI, and for lower HDL-C in G&H, consistent with our findings for EUR samples. Conclusions The genetic loci for CAD and its risk factors are largely transferable from EUR studies to British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, whereas the transferability of PGSs varies greatly between traits. Our analyses suggest clinical utility for addition of PGS to existing clinical risk prediction tools for this population. Clinical Perspective What is new? This is the first study to explore the transferability of GWAS findings and PGSs for CAD and related cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistani and Bangladeshi individuals from a cohort with real-world electronic clinical data. We propose a new approach to assessing transferability of GWAS loci between populations, which can serve as a new methodological standard in this developing field. We find evidence of overall high transferability of GWAS loci in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. BMI, lipids and blood pressure show the highest transferability of loci, and CAD the lowest. The transferability of PGSs varied between traits, being high for HDL-C, triglycerides and blood pressure but more modest for CAD, BMI and LDL-C. Our results suggest that, for some traits, the use of transferable GWAS loci improves the robustness of Mendelian randomisation estimates in non-Europeans. What are the clinical implications? The polygenic score for CAD derived from genetic studies of European individuals improves reclassification on top of clinical risk factors in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. The improvement was driven by identification of more cases in younger individuals (25–54 years old), and of controls in older individuals (55–84 years old). Incorporation of the polygenic score for CAD into risk prediction models is likely to prevent cardiovascular events and deaths in this population.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,055

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,030
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations77
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNature Communications→Même sujetGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→Travaux en français237 207→