MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4292493559 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.001

Reply to Yalta and Yetkin—Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Indications for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy

2022· article· en· W4292493559 sur OpenAlexaff
Stephen A. Duffett, Frédéric L. Paulin

Notice bibliographique

RevueCJC Open · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePalpitationsImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorSarcoidosisSudden cardiac deathInternal medicineCardiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We thank Drs Yalta and Yetkin for their article on indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.1Yalta K. Yetkin E. Cardiac sarcoidosis: indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.CJC Open. 2022; 4: 823-824Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar They have provided a helpful summary document that nicely reviews the guidelines for ICD therapy in this population and outlines challenges of management in these cases.The main indication for ICD therapy in our case was the presenting symptoms, and not merely a case of primary prophylaxis.2Powell R.G.G. Paulin F.L. Flemming J. Harris S. Duffett S.A. Multiple intramyocardial masses in an otherwise healthy 35-year-old woman.CJC Open. 2021; 4: 432-434Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar The extent of the disease was impressive, and presumed sarcoidosis masquerading as cardiac tumours was the main reason for presenting the case. This was not the primary reason for device implant. The patient presented with recurrent episodes of palpitations, chest tightness, and profound weakness. This occurred over the course of a couple of weeks. During 2 of these episodes, she felt very unwell, with near syncope. We did not document any sustained arrhythmia during hospital monitoring. However, her symptoms sounded very concerning for hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia. We did discuss doing an electrophysiological study among our group, but we felt that the presenting symptoms warranted a prophylactic ICD even if the electrophysiological study were to be negative. We felt that she met the guideline for near-syncope with arrhythmic origin.3Birnie D.H. Sauer W.H. Bogun F. et al.HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis.Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11: 1304-1323Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (744) Google Scholar Admittedly, the severity of these episodes is not well captured in the original case report.Following a tapering dose of prednisone, a repeat positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography scan demonstrated increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the cardiac masses and hilar nodes. The masses appeared to be slightly smaller on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, but they were active again on PET. Given that we did not have definitive pathology on the prior lymph node biopsy, a cardiac biopsy was performed of the inferior mass using intracardiac echo guidance. Unfortunately, this procedure demonstrated nonspecific inflammatory changes. The patient was restarted on high-dose prednisone, this time with the addition of methotrexate and pending follow-up PET. Unfortunately, she had presented recently with an appropriate shock from her device (Fig. 1). Of note, her device is programmed to deliver anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) during charging, but it did not do so in this case, due to Smart Mode.4Medtronic AcademyVentricular antitachycardia pacing feature.https://www.medtronicacademy.com/features/ventricular-antitachycardia-pacing-featureDate accessed: August 1, 2022Google Scholar A preceding shorter episode had failed to terminate with ATP, so further ATP attempts were disabled for this zone. This first episode stopped spontaneously without a shock. The episode shown in Figure 1 is the second episode that day. This second episode required a shock for termination. The only finding on electrocardiogram were isolated premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmia appears to initiate following a premature ventricular contraction. No QT prolongation and no pause-dependent arrhythmia occurred. The patient was started on amiodarone, and short-term follow-up has been arranged. We thank Drs Yalta and Yetkin for their article on indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.1Yalta K. Yetkin E. Cardiac sarcoidosis: indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.CJC Open. 2022; 4: 823-824Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar They have provided a helpful summary document that nicely reviews the guidelines for ICD therapy in this population and outlines challenges of management in these cases. The main indication for ICD therapy in our case was the presenting symptoms, and not merely a case of primary prophylaxis.2Powell R.G.G. Paulin F.L. Flemming J. Harris S. Duffett S.A. Multiple intramyocardial masses in an otherwise healthy 35-year-old woman.CJC Open. 2021; 4: 432-434Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar The extent of the disease was impressive, and presumed sarcoidosis masquerading as cardiac tumours was the main reason for presenting the case. This was not the primary reason for device implant. The patient presented with recurrent episodes of palpitations, chest tightness, and profound weakness. This occurred over the course of a couple of weeks. During 2 of these episodes, she felt very unwell, with near syncope. We did not document any sustained arrhythmia during hospital monitoring. However, her symptoms sounded very concerning for hemodynamically significant ventricular arrhythmia. We did discuss doing an electrophysiological study among our group, but we felt that the presenting symptoms warranted a prophylactic ICD even if the electrophysiological study were to be negative. We felt that she met the guideline for near-syncope with arrhythmic origin.3Birnie D.H. Sauer W.H. Bogun F. et al.HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis.Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11: 1304-1323Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (744) Google Scholar Admittedly, the severity of these episodes is not well captured in the original case report. Following a tapering dose of prednisone, a repeat positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography scan demonstrated increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the cardiac masses and hilar nodes. The masses appeared to be slightly smaller on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, but they were active again on PET. Given that we did not have definitive pathology on the prior lymph node biopsy, a cardiac biopsy was performed of the inferior mass using intracardiac echo guidance. Unfortunately, this procedure demonstrated nonspecific inflammatory changes. The patient was restarted on high-dose prednisone, this time with the addition of methotrexate and pending follow-up PET. Unfortunately, she had presented recently with an appropriate shock from her device (Fig. 1). Of note, her device is programmed to deliver anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) during charging, but it did not do so in this case, due to Smart Mode.4Medtronic AcademyVentricular antitachycardia pacing feature.https://www.medtronicacademy.com/features/ventricular-antitachycardia-pacing-featureDate accessed: August 1, 2022Google Scholar A preceding shorter episode had failed to terminate with ATP, so further ATP attempts were disabled for this zone. This first episode stopped spontaneously without a shock. The episode shown in Figure 1 is the second episode that day. This second episode required a shock for termination. The only finding on electrocardiogram were isolated premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmia appears to initiate following a premature ventricular contraction. No QT prolongation and no pause-dependent arrhythmia occurred. The patient was started on amiodarone, and short-term follow-up has been arranged. This letter adhered to health research ethics guidelines. No funding was received for this letter.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,126
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,524

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCJC OpenMême sujetSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchTravaux en français237 207