MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292493559 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.001

Reply to Yalta and Yetkin—Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Indications for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy

2022· article· en· W4292493559 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen A. Duffett, Frédéric L. Paulin

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalpitationsImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorSarcoidosisSudden cardiac deathInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We thank Drs Yalta and Yetkin for their article on indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.1 They have provided a helpful summary document that nicely reviews the guidelines for ICD therapy in this population and outlines challenges of management in these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0340.047
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207