Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Refrigeration - including air conditioning (AC) – contributes substantially to the modern life of the 21st century and its economy. The food cold chain, air conditioning, healthcare and energy are examples of sectors for which refrigeration is indispensable. About 5 billion refrigeration systems – of different types and sizes– operate worldwide in different applications [1]. The dominant share of equipment providing refrigeration operate on the vapor-compression-cycle principle and use fluorocarbon refrigerants. Concerns about the environmental safety have become the driving force for refrigerant changes within the last 35 years. The phased-out schedule of stratospheric-ozone-depleting fluids was first formulated by the Montreal Protocol (MP) in 1987 and was made more stringent during the follow-up international meetings [2]. The affected chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerants were largely replaced by hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).The 2016 Kigali Amendment to the MP [3] responses to the concerns about the Earth climate change. The refrigeration and AC sectors are attributed with about 7.8 % of global greenhouse gas emissions [4]. This contribution comes in the form of direct effect, which is related to refrigerant emissions from refrigeration systems (37 %), and in the form of indirect effect, which is related to CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power plants producing electricity to power refrigeration systems (63 %) [4]. The Kigali Amendment aims at reducing the direct effect. The effect a given molecule has on the climate change is quantified in a simplified manner by its Global Warming Potential (GWP), a relative index referencing the effect produced to that of the same mass of carbon dioxide released to the atmosphere. By definition, GWP of carbon dioxide is equal to one.While HFC refrigerants have on average a lower GWP than the CFCs and HCFCs they replaced, they are still potent greenhouse gases (GHGs). The Kigali Amendment phases down the use of HFCs by imposing a schedule for reducing a weighted GWP value to be implemented by a country through the year 2047 (Figure 1). It provides four paths depending on the country location and category assigned in the MP, and also prescribes a method for establishing the baseline consumption used for calculating GWP reductions. For developing countries, it is expected to bring the weighed GWP across all refrigeration applications down to about 300 from the baseline value of about 2000. The implementation of Kigali Amendment aims at reducing the future warming due to HFCs from the range of 0.3 °C to 0.5 °C to less than 0.1 °C [5]. While this reduction may seem to be small, it must be viewed in the context of the 2015 Paris Agreement [6], which calls for holding global warming to well below 2 °C and pursuing to limit global warming to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial levels [6]. Considering that average global temperatures reached 1 °C above pre-industrial levels for the first time in 2015 [7], the Earth is already within 1 °C of the “2 °C limit”.The low-GWP requirement narrows the pool of fluids that can be considered for application as a refrigerant [8]. This Informatory Note discusses low-GWP refrigerant options for major applications and presents their selection merits.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».