Bibliographic record
Abstract
Refrigeration - including air conditioning (AC) – contributes substantially to the modern life of the 21st century and its economy. The food cold chain, air conditioning, healthcare and energy are examples of sectors for which refrigeration is indispensable. About 5 billion refrigeration systems – of different types and sizes– operate worldwide in different applications [1]. The dominant share of equipment providing refrigeration operate on the vapor-compression-cycle principle and use fluorocarbon refrigerants. Concerns about the environmental safety have become the driving force for refrigerant changes within the last 35 years. The phased-out schedule of stratospheric-ozone-depleting fluids was first formulated by the Montreal Protocol (MP) in 1987 and was made more stringent during the follow-up international meetings [2]. The affected chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) refrigerants were largely replaced by hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).The 2016 Kigali Amendment to the MP [3] responses to the concerns about the Earth climate change. The refrigeration and AC sectors are attributed with about 7.8 % of global greenhouse gas emissions [4]. This contribution comes in the form of direct effect, which is related to refrigerant emissions from refrigeration systems (37 %), and in the form of indirect effect, which is related to CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power plants producing electricity to power refrigeration systems (63 %) [4]. The Kigali Amendment aims at reducing the direct effect. The effect a given molecule has on the climate change is quantified in a simplified manner by its Global Warming Potential (GWP), a relative index referencing the effect produced to that of the same mass of carbon dioxide released to the atmosphere. By definition, GWP of carbon dioxide is equal to one.While HFC refrigerants have on average a lower GWP than the CFCs and HCFCs they replaced, they are still potent greenhouse gases (GHGs). The Kigali Amendment phases down the use of HFCs by imposing a schedule for reducing a weighted GWP value to be implemented by a country through the year 2047 (Figure 1). It provides four paths depending on the country location and category assigned in the MP, and also prescribes a method for establishing the baseline consumption used for calculating GWP reductions. For developing countries, it is expected to bring the weighed GWP across all refrigeration applications down to about 300 from the baseline value of about 2000. The implementation of Kigali Amendment aims at reducing the future warming due to HFCs from the range of 0.3 °C to 0.5 °C to less than 0.1 °C [5]. While this reduction may seem to be small, it must be viewed in the context of the 2015 Paris Agreement [6], which calls for holding global warming to well below 2 °C and pursuing to limit global warming to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial levels [6]. Considering that average global temperatures reached 1 °C above pre-industrial levels for the first time in 2015 [7], the Earth is already within 1 °C of the “2 °C limit”.The low-GWP requirement narrows the pool of fluids that can be considered for application as a refrigerant [8]. This Informatory Note discusses low-GWP refrigerant options for major applications and presents their selection merits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".