MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4294730726 · doi:10.1353/ail.2022.0003

Embodiment in an Indigenous Lit Classroom: Why I'm Over Discussion but Can't Get Enough of Research-Creation

2022· article· en· W4294730726 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keavy Martin

Notice bibliographique

RevueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousAdmirationPoliticsWhite (mutation)TreatySociologyReading (process)PedagogyMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychologySocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Embodiment in an Indigenous Lit ClassroomWhy I'm Over Discussion but Can't Get Enough of Research-Creation Keavy Martin (bio) This article reflects on a course, ENGL 309: Indigenous Literatures (Literary Movements), taught at the University of Alberta in Treaty 6/Métis Nation (Region 4) in 2018. My focus here is on the particular challenges brought about by the diverse identities and needs of the students—and by the core problem that the learning process of some at times renders the classroom uninhabitable for others. Over the years, this has led me to question whether dialogue and discussion, those core features of a liberal education, benefit everyone equally. Instead, I turn increasingly to creative research methods (also known in Canada as research-creation1) as ways for students to respond to texts and to work through the issues that they raise. introductory position Like other white instructors of Indigenous literature courses, my relationship to this work is a fraught one. Although all of us no doubt come to this teaching with strong ideals—out of a sense of political commitment, out of admiration for the brilliance of Indigenous authors and thinkers, and/or because of the ways in which reading Indigenous literatures has changed and enriched our lives—the fact is that our very presence at the front of the classroom is not unrelated to white supremacy. No matter how I might try to comport myself as a good treaty relative, to treat students with respect, and to follow the guidance of key scholars and writers with regards to the teaching of Indigenous texts, this risk remains. When I first began teaching, my husband Richard Van Camp shared with me a lesson he had learned from the late Maurice Kenny: that "when you stand up in front of a group of people, you become a [End Page 16] symbol for something that you can't control." White supremacy and settler-colonialism, after all, are not structures that we can individually opt out of, as much as we might try to trouble them. I now begin each new course by trying to de-naturalize my own position of authority, saying to my students something like, 'Having a white professor in an Indigenous literatures course is not ideal. This is something that is gradually shifting. But since this is the current situation, we will use the opportunity to engage with diverse Indigenous perspectives through text—and we will approach them with the utmost respect.' Ultimately, my hope would be to teach in a department where Indigenous literature courses are fully staffed by Indigenous experts, but also where the rest of the instructors ensure that all of our courses engage with our local contexts and with the wider reality of Indigenous resurgence, thereby helping to fulfill our university's pledge at the 2014 Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Alberta National Event "that all of our graduates understand the negative impacts of colonization and the importance of building more respectful relationships." course creation This 2018 iteration of the course was prompted by, and structured around, the problems that have consistently arisen in previous versions, the central one being the challenge of making the class work for a widely diverse group of students. Put more plainly: I wondered how to ensure that the learning processes of the majority white settler students would not inadvertently become the focus of the class. The work of grappling with representations of settler-colonial violence and Indigenous refusal, after all, can produce a whole spectrum of responses for white students; though important, these responses need to be managed and supported carefully if they are not going to detract from the learning of racialized students, for whom the classroom often risks becoming an exhausting space. By way of example, Billy-Ray Belcourt and Maura Roberts write in their 2016 GUTS article "Making Friends for the End of the World" about an experience they endured in one of my courses, where in the first week or so, after I had placed them into small discussion groups, Belcourt was challenged by a white male student who wanted to question whether colonialism was really so bad. "Indigenous peoples," [End Page 17...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,501
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,418
Écart entre enseignants0,388 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207