MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294730726 · doi:10.1353/ail.2022.0003

Embodiment in an Indigenous Lit Classroom: Why I'm Over Discussion but Can't Get Enough of Research-Creation

2022· article· en· W4294730726 on OpenAlex
Keavy Martin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousAdmirationPoliticsWhite (mutation)TreatySociologyReading (process)PedagogyMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embodiment in an Indigenous Lit ClassroomWhy I'm Over Discussion but Can't Get Enough of Research-Creation Keavy Martin (bio) This article reflects on a course, ENGL 309: Indigenous Literatures (Literary Movements), taught at the University of Alberta in Treaty 6/Métis Nation (Region 4) in 2018. My focus here is on the particular challenges brought about by the diverse identities and needs of the students—and by the core problem that the learning process of some at times renders the classroom uninhabitable for others. Over the years, this has led me to question whether dialogue and discussion, those core features of a liberal education, benefit everyone equally. Instead, I turn increasingly to creative research methods (also known in Canada as research-creation1) as ways for students to respond to texts and to work through the issues that they raise. introductory position Like other white instructors of Indigenous literature courses, my relationship to this work is a fraught one. Although all of us no doubt come to this teaching with strong ideals—out of a sense of political commitment, out of admiration for the brilliance of Indigenous authors and thinkers, and/or because of the ways in which reading Indigenous literatures has changed and enriched our lives—the fact is that our very presence at the front of the classroom is not unrelated to white supremacy. No matter how I might try to comport myself as a good treaty relative, to treat students with respect, and to follow the guidance of key scholars and writers with regards to the teaching of Indigenous texts, this risk remains. When I first began teaching, my husband Richard Van Camp shared with me a lesson he had learned from the late Maurice Kenny: that "when you stand up in front of a group of people, you become a [End Page 16] symbol for something that you can't control." White supremacy and settler-colonialism, after all, are not structures that we can individually opt out of, as much as we might try to trouble them. I now begin each new course by trying to de-naturalize my own position of authority, saying to my students something like, 'Having a white professor in an Indigenous literatures course is not ideal. This is something that is gradually shifting. But since this is the current situation, we will use the opportunity to engage with diverse Indigenous perspectives through text—and we will approach them with the utmost respect.' Ultimately, my hope would be to teach in a department where Indigenous literature courses are fully staffed by Indigenous experts, but also where the rest of the instructors ensure that all of our courses engage with our local contexts and with the wider reality of Indigenous resurgence, thereby helping to fulfill our university's pledge at the 2014 Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Alberta National Event "that all of our graduates understand the negative impacts of colonization and the importance of building more respectful relationships." course creation This 2018 iteration of the course was prompted by, and structured around, the problems that have consistently arisen in previous versions, the central one being the challenge of making the class work for a widely diverse group of students. Put more plainly: I wondered how to ensure that the learning processes of the majority white settler students would not inadvertently become the focus of the class. The work of grappling with representations of settler-colonial violence and Indigenous refusal, after all, can produce a whole spectrum of responses for white students; though important, these responses need to be managed and supported carefully if they are not going to detract from the learning of racialized students, for whom the classroom often risks becoming an exhausting space. By way of example, Billy-Ray Belcourt and Maura Roberts write in their 2016 GUTS article "Making Friends for the End of the World" about an experience they endured in one of my courses, where in the first week or so, after I had placed them into small discussion groups, Belcourt was challenged by a white male student who wanted to question whether colonialism was really so bad. "Indigenous peoples," [End Page 17...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it