MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4296016154 · doi:10.1111/cod.14221

Allergic contact dermatitis from a skin‐calming cream containing hydroxyphenyl propamidobenzoic acid

2022· article· en· W4296016154 sur OpenAlex
Gabriela Blanchard, Anna Walker, Ella Dendooven, Olivier Aerts, An Goossens, Michel Gilliet, Teofila Seremet

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueContact Dermatitis · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAllergic contact dermatitisDermatologyContact dermatitisPatch testRashAllergyIrritant contact dermatitisTrunkSurgeryImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Hydroxyphenyl propamidobenzoic acid (HPPBA; syn. dihydroavenanthramide D) is a synthetic analogue of naturally occurring avenanthramide which can be found in oats.1 Symcalmin is a 5% solution of HPPBA in a vehicle of (1:1) butylene glycol and pentylene glycol and is commonly used by the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry for its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant (i.e., anti-irritant and anti-itch) properties.2-4 We report the first case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) likely caused by HPPBA. A 29-year-old Caucasian female, with no relevant medical history, presented with a generalized eczema evolving for 1 week. The rash had initially appeared on her left forearm and had secondarily spread to the trunk and limbs (Figure 1A–C). Three weeks earlier, she had been diagnosed with a left-handed De Quervain's tenosynovitis, for which she had applied an etofenamate-containing gel (Traumalix DOLO gel 5%, Drossapharm SA, Basel, Switzerland) and a Symcalmin-containing wound-healing cream (Bepanthen Sensiderm, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). Patch tests were performed with the European baseline, cosmetic, preservative and excipient series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Vellinge, Sweden, and AllergEAZE, Calgary, Canada), and with the patient's own products (patch-tested “as is”). All tests were mounted on IQ Ultra chambers (Chemotechnique Diagnostics), fixed with Mefix (Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden) and occluded for 48 h. Readings, performed on day (D) 2 and D4 according to International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria, showed a positive reaction to Traumalix DOLO gel 5% (D2++, D4+++) and Bepanthen Sensiderm (D2−−, D4++) (Figure 1D). Further patch-testing confirmed contact allergy to etofenamate 2% pet (Chemotechnique Diagnostics), the active ingredient in Traumalix DOLO gel 5% (D2++, D4+++) (Figure 1E). The individual ingredients of Bepanthen Sensiderm, kindly provided by the manufacturer in the same concentrations as found in Bepanthen Sensiderm, were subsequently patch-tested. They showed a positive reaction to Symcalmin, 5% solution of HPPBA in a vehicle of (1:1) butylene glycol and pentylene glycol (D2−, D4++) (Figure 1F), along with a negative reaction to both, dexpanthenol and pantolactone as well as to sodium benzoate 5% pet and benzyl alcohol 1% pet. Additional patch tests with butylene glycol (5%, 50aq/50alc) (La Roche Posay, La Roche Posay, France) and pentylene glycol (5%, 50aq/50alc) (La Roche Posay, La Roche Posay, France) both showed negative reaction. HPPBA (Figure 2) could not be patch-tested separately. Six unexposed controls were negative to the Symcalmin preparation. Generalized ACD caused by etofenamate in Traumalix DOLO gel 5%, and in addition due to Symcalmin, most likely to its component HPPBA, in Bepanthen Sensiderm, was thus diagnosed. The recommendation for the patient was to avoid both topical and systemic etofenamate-containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as well as products containing HPPBA. Etofenamate, used most commonly in a gel formulation, is a frequently used NSAID and may cause both allergic and photo-allergic contact dermatitis.5, 6 In our case, etofenamate was considered to be a relevant contact allergen, along with HPPBA, the latter present in a skin-calming cream also containing dexpanthenol. Dexpanthenol,7 and its impurity pantolactone, are cosmetic allergens, the latter potentially even being the actual sensitizer in panthenol-containing products.8 Initially we had suspected these particular haptens to be at the origin of the reported reaction after application of Bepanthen Sensiderm; however, patch testing with both dexpanthenol and pantolactone remained negative, yet pointed towards a new sensitizing culprit, that is, HPPBA. False negative reactions to butylene glycol or pentylene glycol are not probable as at least patch testing with pentylene glycol resulted in a positive reaction (+++) in another patient patch-tested the same week as our patient (data not shown). Unfortunately, HPPBA, which is increasingly used in a wide range of cosmetic products,9 is currently not commercially available for patch-testing. More cases of ACD from this agent might however be encountered in the near future. Discussed patient gave consent for her photographs and medical information to be published in print and online and with the understanding that this information may be publicly available. Open access funding provided by Universite de Lausanne. Olivier Aerts is investigator, speaker and/or consultant for Leo Pharma and L'Oréal/La Roche Posay.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,232
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle