MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296016154 · doi:10.1111/cod.14221

Allergic contact dermatitis from a skin‐calming cream containing hydroxyphenyl propamidobenzoic acid

2022· article· en· W4296016154 on OpenAlex
Gabriela Blanchard, Anna Walker, Ella Dendooven, Olivier Aerts, An Goossens, Michel Gilliet, Teofila Seremet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContact Dermatitis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAllergic contact dermatitisDermatologyContact dermatitisPatch testRashAllergyIrritant contact dermatitisTrunkSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroxyphenyl propamidobenzoic acid (HPPBA; syn. dihydroavenanthramide D) is a synthetic analogue of naturally occurring avenanthramide which can be found in oats.1 Symcalmin is a 5% solution of HPPBA in a vehicle of (1:1) butylene glycol and pentylene glycol and is commonly used by the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry for its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant (i.e., anti-irritant and anti-itch) properties.2-4 We report the first case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) likely caused by HPPBA. A 29-year-old Caucasian female, with no relevant medical history, presented with a generalized eczema evolving for 1 week. The rash had initially appeared on her left forearm and had secondarily spread to the trunk and limbs (Figure 1A–C). Three weeks earlier, she had been diagnosed with a left-handed De Quervain's tenosynovitis, for which she had applied an etofenamate-containing gel (Traumalix DOLO gel 5%, Drossapharm SA, Basel, Switzerland) and a Symcalmin-containing wound-healing cream (Bepanthen Sensiderm, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). Patch tests were performed with the European baseline, cosmetic, preservative and excipient series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Vellinge, Sweden, and AllergEAZE, Calgary, Canada), and with the patient's own products (patch-tested “as is”). All tests were mounted on IQ Ultra chambers (Chemotechnique Diagnostics), fixed with Mefix (Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden) and occluded for 48 h. Readings, performed on day (D) 2 and D4 according to International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria, showed a positive reaction to Traumalix DOLO gel 5% (D2++, D4+++) and Bepanthen Sensiderm (D2−−, D4++) (Figure 1D). Further patch-testing confirmed contact allergy to etofenamate 2% pet (Chemotechnique Diagnostics), the active ingredient in Traumalix DOLO gel 5% (D2++, D4+++) (Figure 1E). The individual ingredients of Bepanthen Sensiderm, kindly provided by the manufacturer in the same concentrations as found in Bepanthen Sensiderm, were subsequently patch-tested. They showed a positive reaction to Symcalmin, 5% solution of HPPBA in a vehicle of (1:1) butylene glycol and pentylene glycol (D2−, D4++) (Figure 1F), along with a negative reaction to both, dexpanthenol and pantolactone as well as to sodium benzoate 5% pet and benzyl alcohol 1% pet. Additional patch tests with butylene glycol (5%, 50aq/50alc) (La Roche Posay, La Roche Posay, France) and pentylene glycol (5%, 50aq/50alc) (La Roche Posay, La Roche Posay, France) both showed negative reaction. HPPBA (Figure 2) could not be patch-tested separately. Six unexposed controls were negative to the Symcalmin preparation. Generalized ACD caused by etofenamate in Traumalix DOLO gel 5%, and in addition due to Symcalmin, most likely to its component HPPBA, in Bepanthen Sensiderm, was thus diagnosed. The recommendation for the patient was to avoid both topical and systemic etofenamate-containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as well as products containing HPPBA. Etofenamate, used most commonly in a gel formulation, is a frequently used NSAID and may cause both allergic and photo-allergic contact dermatitis.5, 6 In our case, etofenamate was considered to be a relevant contact allergen, along with HPPBA, the latter present in a skin-calming cream also containing dexpanthenol. Dexpanthenol,7 and its impurity pantolactone, are cosmetic allergens, the latter potentially even being the actual sensitizer in panthenol-containing products.8 Initially we had suspected these particular haptens to be at the origin of the reported reaction after application of Bepanthen Sensiderm; however, patch testing with both dexpanthenol and pantolactone remained negative, yet pointed towards a new sensitizing culprit, that is, HPPBA. False negative reactions to butylene glycol or pentylene glycol are not probable as at least patch testing with pentylene glycol resulted in a positive reaction (+++) in another patient patch-tested the same week as our patient (data not shown). Unfortunately, HPPBA, which is increasingly used in a wide range of cosmetic products,9 is currently not commercially available for patch-testing. More cases of ACD from this agent might however be encountered in the near future. Discussed patient gave consent for her photographs and medical information to be published in print and online and with the understanding that this information may be publicly available. Open access funding provided by Universite de Lausanne. Olivier Aerts is investigator, speaker and/or consultant for Leo Pharma and L'Oréal/La Roche Posay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it