MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4297891673 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7105668

Perspectives on Micro-Generation: Public Participation in the Low-Carbon Transition in Ireland (MISTRAL)

2021· report· en· W4297891673 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Senni Määttä

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeQueen's UniversityQueen's University BelfastEuropean Commission
Mots-clésTransition (genetics)Carbon fibersPolitical scienceChemistryComputer scienceAlgorithm

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Micro-generation refers to small-scale electricity generation through for example, the use of rooftop solar PV. Public participation has become an increasingly important issue for realising an effective and just low-carbon transition. Material participation, such as micro-generation, is crucial for fostering this more active role of the public (e.g. Ryghaug et al., 2018). The Irish Micro-Generation Scheme (Government of Ireland, 2021c) aims to incentivise and support the uptake of microgeneration in Ireland, and to provide a route to market for citizens to generate electricity and receive a fair price for doing so. The new scheme is prompted by European level developments and the requirements of the recast EU renewable energy directive (RED II) (Directive (EU) 2018/2001, 2018). It represents the next step in facilitating more active public participation in Ireland, following the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS) (Government of Ireland, 2019b). This paper explores stakeholder views on micro-generation as expressed through the Irish Micro-Generation Scheme consultation process. The data for the paper consists of 368 consultation submissions and the official documents related to the consultation (Government of Ireland, 2021b, 2021c). Access to the consultation submissions was gained through a Freedom of Information request (Freedom of Information Act 2014, 2014). The paper investigates public participation in the low-carbon transition in Ireland. In particular, it is concerned with more active participation of individuals in the low-carbon transition and how this is framed. It is informed by two key concepts: prosumer and energy citizen (e.g. Devine-Wright, 2007; Lennon et al., 2020; Miller & Senadeera, 2017). Prosumers are individuals actively participating in energy production. They can be seen as a subset of energy citizens who are considered to have a broader role and responsibility in the low-carbon transition. This framing is in contrast to that of the public as consumers, passive users of energy often perceived as delaying progress and the transition to low carbon. The paper analyses different perspectives on micro-generation, by focusing on two research questions: • 1. What perspectives on prosumerism are expressed in the Irish Micro-Generation Scheme consultation submissions? • 2. What are the challenges and opportunities for Irish energy citizenship highlighted by the MicroGeneration Scheme consultation? The paper is timely as it can inform debate before the final version of the scheme is published. The paper provides a number of findings which can help the finalisation of the scheme, expected to be considered by Government before the end of the year but also help shape future work on active public participation in Ireland. This future work includes for example the National Dialogue on Climate Action, which is a forum for collaboration between citizens, communities, youth, the Government, and relevant agencies on climate change (Government of Ireland, 2021a). First, it finds, that the views expressed in the submissions are aligned with a strong prosumerist viewpoint and a desire to actively participate in and benefit from the low-carbon energy transition. This highlights potential for significant increase in micro-generation in Ireland. Second, there are tensions between the prosumerist perspective which emerges in the submissions, and the approach proposed in the consultation process. The core tension is between the commitment by government to the energy efficiency first principle which means, that supports for micro-generation are linked to requirements around Building Energy Rating (BER). The commitment to energy efficiency first principle in Ireland is in line with wider EU and Irish policy but may work to hinder the uptake of micro-generation and decrease the accessibility of the scheme. A second tension is linked to caps which the public feels are limiting but which are seen as a means of ensuring against over remuneration and to support self-consumption. Third, the paper argues that, in terms of future consultation, the value of the consultative work would be increased if a more comprehensive official response was provided to the submissions. In addition, increased attention to the readability and clarity of consultation documents would improve the effectiveness and accessibility of consultation. Finally, transparent assessment of the inclusivity and costs of the scheme for micro-generators would further underpin the credibility of the consultation process.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,123

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,013
Communication savante0,0120,007
Science ouverte0,0010,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,092
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism→Travaux en français237 207→