Perspectives on Micro-Generation: Public Participation in the Low-Carbon Transition in Ireland (MISTRAL)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micro-generation refers to small-scale electricity generation through for example, the use of rooftop solar PV. Public participation has become an increasingly important issue for realising an effective and just low-carbon transition. Material participation, such as micro-generation, is crucial for fostering this more active role of the public (e.g. Ryghaug et al., 2018). The Irish Micro-Generation Scheme (Government of Ireland, 2021c) aims to incentivise and support the uptake of microgeneration in Ireland, and to provide a route to market for citizens to generate electricity and receive a fair price for doing so. The new scheme is prompted by European level developments and the requirements of the recast EU renewable energy directive (RED II) (Directive (EU) 2018/2001, 2018). It represents the next step in facilitating more active public participation in Ireland, following the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS) (Government of Ireland, 2019b). This paper explores stakeholder views on micro-generation as expressed through the Irish Micro-Generation Scheme consultation process. The data for the paper consists of 368 consultation submissions and the official documents related to the consultation (Government of Ireland, 2021b, 2021c). Access to the consultation submissions was gained through a Freedom of Information request (Freedom of Information Act 2014, 2014). The paper investigates public participation in the low-carbon transition in Ireland. In particular, it is concerned with more active participation of individuals in the low-carbon transition and how this is framed. It is informed by two key concepts: prosumer and energy citizen (e.g. Devine-Wright, 2007; Lennon et al., 2020; Miller & Senadeera, 2017). Prosumers are individuals actively participating in energy production. They can be seen as a subset of energy citizens who are considered to have a broader role and responsibility in the low-carbon transition. This framing is in contrast to that of the public as consumers, passive users of energy often perceived as delaying progress and the transition to low carbon. The paper analyses different perspectives on micro-generation, by focusing on two research questions: • 1. What perspectives on prosumerism are expressed in the Irish Micro-Generation Scheme consultation submissions? • 2. What are the challenges and opportunities for Irish energy citizenship highlighted by the MicroGeneration Scheme consultation? The paper is timely as it can inform debate before the final version of the scheme is published. The paper provides a number of findings which can help the finalisation of the scheme, expected to be considered by Government before the end of the year but also help shape future work on active public participation in Ireland. This future work includes for example the National Dialogue on Climate Action, which is a forum for collaboration between citizens, communities, youth, the Government, and relevant agencies on climate change (Government of Ireland, 2021a). First, it finds, that the views expressed in the submissions are aligned with a strong prosumerist viewpoint and a desire to actively participate in and benefit from the low-carbon energy transition. This highlights potential for significant increase in micro-generation in Ireland. Second, there are tensions between the prosumerist perspective which emerges in the submissions, and the approach proposed in the consultation process. The core tension is between the commitment by government to the energy efficiency first principle which means, that supports for micro-generation are linked to requirements around Building Energy Rating (BER). The commitment to energy efficiency first principle in Ireland is in line with wider EU and Irish policy but may work to hinder the uptake of micro-generation and decrease the accessibility of the scheme. A second tension is linked to caps which the public feels are limiting but which are seen as a means of ensuring against over remuneration and to support self-consumption. Third, the paper argues that, in terms of future consultation, the value of the consultative work would be increased if a more comprehensive official response was provided to the submissions. In addition, increased attention to the readability and clarity of consultation documents would improve the effectiveness and accessibility of consultation. Finally, transparent assessment of the inclusivity and costs of the scheme for micro-generators would further underpin the credibility of the consultation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".