Research on Restorative Justice in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence

Introduction This chapter will review the evaluation research on restorative justice (RJ) in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV). What do we know about how well RJ ensures the safety and immediate needs of survivors? What do we know about whether survivors feel a sense of justice as a result of these practices? What do we know about the ability of these practices to hold offenders accountable, and to prevent further offending? The discussion begins with a brief description of the three most common forms of RJ, and a brief look at some of the evaluation research conducted on these practices. Next, the research literature on RJ and IPV will be reviewed. Following this review, attention will be paid to some recent developments in RJ and other alternative approaches to crimes of sexual assault and severe violence. The research literature on RJ and IPV is remarkably small, and as a result the potential of RJ might best be seen by also considering its application to other serious forms of victimization. Common forms of RJ There are three forms of RJ that are commonly used in cases of IPV—namely, victim–offender mediation (VOM), family group conferencing, and peacemaking and sentencing circles—all of which share a set of goals. They seek to hold offenders accountable; empower those who are victimized; allow for the expression of feelings; clarify facts about the crime; provide an opportunity to address the impact of the crime on the survivors and those around them; and come to an agreement about how the offender can make amends. Victim–offender mediation (VOM) VOM involves a direct, mediated interaction between victims and offenders. This is sometimes called victim–offender dialog (VOD), or (as will be discussed later) victim–offender conferencing (VOC). The power of this process lies in the emotional exchange between the parties. Extensive preparation of both victims and offenders is essential to effective practice. The mediator must explain the process and the potential outcomes to both parties. Mediators also need to assess whether the victims and offenders are ready for such an encounter. Arising in Canada and the US in the early 1970s, VOM is now a global phenomenon; there are now over 1,200 programs worldwide (Victim Offender Mediation Association, 2014).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.