Multidisciplinary approaches to transition
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter launches a critical exploration of the state of knowledge on transitions in late life. Transition is a standard concept used in social sciences and policy to anchor notions of continuity and change throughout the lifecourse. As such, it is relevant to the study of ageing in contemporary society. This chapter outlines prominent academic approaches in the social sciences; reviews the contributions from the multidisciplinary fields of anthropology, sociology and psychology; and outlines how these ideas have been interpreted in social gerontology. Key themes developed in each of the disciplines are presented according to the following subsections: transition as a passage of rite or ritual; transition as movement between roles or status; and transitions as adaptation or development. Although the organisation of the material roughly corresponds with the disciplines, the intent is to clarify how ideas in each of the fields have influenced contemporary approaches to late life in social gerontology. As such, this chapter provides a multidisciplinary base from which to compare and contrast personal, social, and cultural shapes of ageing and late life. Questions to be explored in this chapter include: • What is meant by transition in the social sciences? How have transitions been understood across varying disciplines? • How has social gerontology approached the study of transition? What key themes, debates and dilemmas can be identified? • How do dominant understandings of transition contribute to, or shape, expectations of stability and change in late life? • What relevant notions are worthy of re-examination? The academic study of transition Multidisciplinary approaches to the study of transition are linked by common threads as well as separated by distinctive interpretations. Consistent among the approaches is the underlying basis of studying change and movement across time, assessment of the degree of conformity or difference, and concern for timing or predictability. Differences relate to the primary focus, level of analysis and disciplinary boundaries of study. Anthropology tends to focus on cultural meanings and practices related to change; sociology on roles and status; and psychology on developmental tasks and coping. They also differ in whether changes are considered on an individual or social level, as well as whether transitions are viewed as fixed moments or constructed accounts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,030 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle