MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300500104 · doi:10.46692/9781847426932.004

Multidisciplinary approaches to transition

2012· other· en· W4300500104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachTransition (genetics)Computer scienceData scienceSociologyChemistrySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter launches a critical exploration of the state of knowledge on transitions in late life. Transition is a standard concept used in social sciences and policy to anchor notions of continuity and change throughout the lifecourse. As such, it is relevant to the study of ageing in contemporary society. This chapter outlines prominent academic approaches in the social sciences; reviews the contributions from the multidisciplinary fields of anthropology, sociology and psychology; and outlines how these ideas have been interpreted in social gerontology. Key themes developed in each of the disciplines are presented according to the following subsections: transition as a passage of rite or ritual; transition as movement between roles or status; and transitions as adaptation or development. Although the organisation of the material roughly corresponds with the disciplines, the intent is to clarify how ideas in each of the fields have influenced contemporary approaches to late life in social gerontology. As such, this chapter provides a multidisciplinary base from which to compare and contrast personal, social, and cultural shapes of ageing and late life. Questions to be explored in this chapter include: • What is meant by transition in the social sciences? How have transitions been understood across varying disciplines? • How has social gerontology approached the study of transition? What key themes, debates and dilemmas can be identified? • How do dominant understandings of transition contribute to, or shape, expectations of stability and change in late life? • What relevant notions are worthy of re-examination? The academic study of transition Multidisciplinary approaches to the study of transition are linked by common threads as well as separated by distinctive interpretations. Consistent among the approaches is the underlying basis of studying change and movement across time, assessment of the degree of conformity or difference, and concern for timing or predictability. Differences relate to the primary focus, level of analysis and disciplinary boundaries of study. Anthropology tends to focus on cultural meanings and practices related to change; sociology on roles and status; and psychology on developmental tasks and coping. They also differ in whether changes are considered on an individual or social level, as well as whether transitions are viewed as fixed moments or constructed accounts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it