MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4306680735 · doi:10.1115/1.4056012

Special Section on Data-Driven Mechanics and Digital Twins for Ocean Engineering

2022· article· en· W4306680735 sur OpenAlexaff
Rajeev K. Jaiman, Lance Manuel

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWakeDynamic mode decompositionFlow (mathematics)Nonlinear systemModalComputer scienceMarine engineeringEngineeringMechanicsPhysicsAerospace engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This Special Section issue focuses on the topic of Data-Driven Mechanics and Digital Twins for Ocean Engineering. Two categories of papers are included in this section that deals with (i) reduced-order modeling and data analytics and (ii) data-driven computing and digital twins. In the first category, Yin et al. presented the modal analysis of hydrodynamic forces in flow-induced vibrations using dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). Using snapshots of the flow field, spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the wake patterns are analyzed. The dominant DMD modes with their corresponding frequencies are identified and used to reconstruct the flow fields. In another paper in this category, Janocha et al. presented a 3D large eddy simulation and data-driven analysis of the flow around a flexibly mounted cylinder via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis. The POD-based modal extractions are performed on slices in the wake to identify the coherent structure in the flow. Vortex shedding modes are analyzed and classified by examining three-dimensional wake flow structures. Such a body of work is useful for building reduced-order (surrogate) models that can be considered for multiquery analysis, design optimization, and feedback control. However, these POD/DMD studies are restricted to linear physics as well as to idealized canonical geometries. There is a need for further extension to large-scale marine and offshore structures (e.g., offshore wind turbines, marine risers, and pipelines). Moreover, projection-based POD/DMD techniques generally face difficulties to scale for highly nonlinear turbulent flow. Nonlinear model reduction and deep neural networks (e.g., convolutional autoencoders) are possible alternatives to be explored for advanced reduced-order modeling.In the second category, advancements in data-driven methods and machine learning toward the development of physics-based digital twins are sought. Essentially, this category focuses on the integration aspects of AI/ML and data analytics with sensor technology, the Internet of things, cloud computing, etc. Toward this aim, Mehlan et al. explored a novel virtual sensor concept for online load monitoring and life estimation of a wind turbine gearbox. By combining data from a condition monitoring system (CMS) and a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, the authors demonstrate the efficacy of their framework for the estimation of remaining useful life and fatigue damage. This is an excellent demonstration of the digital twin framework relying on data, a virtual model, and decision support for structural health monitoring. State-of-the-art techniques such as the use of Kalman filters and a least-squares estimator are used for predicting loads. With regard to the physical modeling, the authors used an aero-hydro-elastic solver along with the multibody simulation. There is potential to improve the physical accuracy of the mechanics data by considering computational fluid dynamics and other coupled mechanics effects. Moreover, some of the linearized state predictions can be improved by nonlinear data-driven model reduction and deep learning techniques, as mentioned earlier. Finally, this special issue includes a technical brief by Panda and Warrior, which uses machine learning for the flow field over an axisymmetric body of revolution. State-of-the-art ML models namely random forest, artificial neural network (ANN), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms are considered. The Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM)-based simulations are used to generate data for training and testing of ML-based surrogate models. The authors report promising results for predicting the flow field beyond the training range using the CNN- and ANN-based surrogate models. As pointed out by the authors, the work needs further investigation for a broad range of Reynolds numbers and geometry parameters to evaluate the generalization capabilities of the ML-based surrogate models.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,921
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,795

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringMême sujetFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisTravaux en français237 207