MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306680735 · doi:10.1115/1.4056012

Special Section on Data-Driven Mechanics and Digital Twins for Ocean Engineering

2022· article· en· W4306680735 on OpenAlexaff
Rajeev K. Jaiman, Lance Manuel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeDynamic mode decompositionFlow (mathematics)Nonlinear systemModalComputer scienceMarine engineeringEngineeringMechanicsPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Special Section issue focuses on the topic of Data-Driven Mechanics and Digital Twins for Ocean Engineering. Two categories of papers are included in this section that deals with (i) reduced-order modeling and data analytics and (ii) data-driven computing and digital twins. In the first category, Yin et al. presented the modal analysis of hydrodynamic forces in flow-induced vibrations using dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). Using snapshots of the flow field, spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the wake patterns are analyzed. The dominant DMD modes with their corresponding frequencies are identified and used to reconstruct the flow fields. In another paper in this category, Janocha et al. presented a 3D large eddy simulation and data-driven analysis of the flow around a flexibly mounted cylinder via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis. The POD-based modal extractions are performed on slices in the wake to identify the coherent structure in the flow. Vortex shedding modes are analyzed and classified by examining three-dimensional wake flow structures. Such a body of work is useful for building reduced-order (surrogate) models that can be considered for multiquery analysis, design optimization, and feedback control. However, these POD/DMD studies are restricted to linear physics as well as to idealized canonical geometries. There is a need for further extension to large-scale marine and offshore structures (e.g., offshore wind turbines, marine risers, and pipelines). Moreover, projection-based POD/DMD techniques generally face difficulties to scale for highly nonlinear turbulent flow. Nonlinear model reduction and deep neural networks (e.g., convolutional autoencoders) are possible alternatives to be explored for advanced reduced-order modeling.In the second category, advancements in data-driven methods and machine learning toward the development of physics-based digital twins are sought. Essentially, this category focuses on the integration aspects of AI/ML and data analytics with sensor technology, the Internet of things, cloud computing, etc. Toward this aim, Mehlan et al. explored a novel virtual sensor concept for online load monitoring and life estimation of a wind turbine gearbox. By combining data from a condition monitoring system (CMS) and a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, the authors demonstrate the efficacy of their framework for the estimation of remaining useful life and fatigue damage. This is an excellent demonstration of the digital twin framework relying on data, a virtual model, and decision support for structural health monitoring. State-of-the-art techniques such as the use of Kalman filters and a least-squares estimator are used for predicting loads. With regard to the physical modeling, the authors used an aero-hydro-elastic solver along with the multibody simulation. There is potential to improve the physical accuracy of the mechanics data by considering computational fluid dynamics and other coupled mechanics effects. Moreover, some of the linearized state predictions can be improved by nonlinear data-driven model reduction and deep learning techniques, as mentioned earlier. Finally, this special issue includes a technical brief by Panda and Warrior, which uses machine learning for the flow field over an axisymmetric body of revolution. State-of-the-art ML models namely random forest, artificial neural network (ANN), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms are considered. The Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM)-based simulations are used to generate data for training and testing of ML-based surrogate models. The authors report promising results for predicting the flow field beyond the training range using the CNN- and ANN-based surrogate models. As pointed out by the authors, the work needs further investigation for a broad range of Reynolds numbers and geometry parameters to evaluate the generalization capabilities of the ML-based surrogate models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207