Observation in a treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with a stable deep molecular response in the Russian portion of the international multicenter population based study EUTOS PBS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction. Given the possibility of preserving molecular remission in 40–60 % of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a stable deep molecular response (MR) after discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), it is important to determine the number of candidates for observation in a treatment-free remission (TFR) and terms of treatment cancellation. Aim — to evaluate the probability of stable deep MR and the rate of patients who meet the criteria for TFR observation in the Russian part of the international multicenter prospective population study EUTOS PBS (European Treatment and Outcome Study — Population-Based Study). Materials and methods. Registration of all CML cases in the EUTOS PBS was conducted in 6 regions of Russia from September 2009 to December 2012. The main inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of CML confirmed by cytogenetic or molecular study in patients aged over 18 years. In total, 197 CML patients were included: 181 (92 %) with chronic phase (CP) CML, 14 (7 %) with accelerated phase (AP) and 2 (1 %) with blast crisis (BC) at diagnosis. Data on therapy and results was updated annually. Results. Deep MR (at least MR4 or BCR::ABL1 level less than 0.01 % IS) was achieved in 104 (54 %) of 192 patients receiving TKI therapy, with a median observation period of 7 years (range from 3 months to 10 years). The probability of a deep MR after 5 years of treatment was 48 % (95 % confidence interval (95% CI): 40–55 %) in patients with CP. The cumulative incidence of a stable deep MR with duration of more than 2 years in CML CP patients was 16 % (95% CI: 11–22 %) after 5 years of therapy, 29 % (95% CI: 22–37 %) after 7 years of therapy and 50 % (95% CI: 38–60 %) after 9 years of therapy. The cumulative incidence of a stable deep MR was significantly higher in those patients who had achieved a deep MR at 36 months of therapy compared to patients with only MMR: 40 % (95% CI: 28–53 %) vs. 3 % (95% CI: 0–13 %) at 5 year of therapy; 66 % (95% CI: 52–77 %) vs. 15 % (95% CI: 5–30 %) at 7 year and 89 % (95% CI: 64–97 %) vs. 48 % (95% CI: 25–67 %) at 9 year (p < 0.0001) in patients without MMR by 36 months. No patients without MMR at 36 months of therapy subsequently gained a stable deep MR. Fifty four patients met the TKI discontinuation criteria for transition into TFR phase: CP CML with a typical BCR::ABL1 p210 transcript, TKI therapy for more than 3 years and a stable deep MR for over 2 years. The rate of possible candidates for cancellation of therapy was 28 % of all 192 patients who received TKI in the study or 31 % in terms of patients with CP CML. Predominantly, patients with low-risk by Sokal or ELTS score were among the potential TFR candidates 26 (48 %) and 33 (61 %), respectively. No patients with long-term resistance to therapy were the TFR candidates. Conclusion. In the Russian portion of the prospective observational multicenter study EUTOS PBS, it was found that with a median duration of TKI therapy of 7 years, about a third of patients with CP CML may be candidates for the controlled therapy discontinuation. If half of these patients remain in molecular remission, up to 15 % of the initial number of patients will be able to continue observation in the TFR. Achievement of MMR and deep MR at 36 months of therapy is associated with a significantly greater likelihood of meeting the criteria for follow-up in the TFR phase in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».