Observation in a treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with a stable deep molecular response in the Russian portion of the international multicenter population based study EUTOS PBS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Given the possibility of preserving molecular remission in 40–60 % of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a stable deep molecular response (MR) after discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), it is important to determine the number of candidates for observation in a treatment-free remission (TFR) and terms of treatment cancellation. Aim — to evaluate the probability of stable deep MR and the rate of patients who meet the criteria for TFR observation in the Russian part of the international multicenter prospective population study EUTOS PBS (European Treatment and Outcome Study — Population-Based Study). Materials and methods. Registration of all CML cases in the EUTOS PBS was conducted in 6 regions of Russia from September 2009 to December 2012. The main inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of CML confirmed by cytogenetic or molecular study in patients aged over 18 years. In total, 197 CML patients were included: 181 (92 %) with chronic phase (CP) CML, 14 (7 %) with accelerated phase (AP) and 2 (1 %) with blast crisis (BC) at diagnosis. Data on therapy and results was updated annually. Results. Deep MR (at least MR4 or BCR::ABL1 level less than 0.01 % IS) was achieved in 104 (54 %) of 192 patients receiving TKI therapy, with a median observation period of 7 years (range from 3 months to 10 years). The probability of a deep MR after 5 years of treatment was 48 % (95 % confidence interval (95% CI): 40–55 %) in patients with CP. The cumulative incidence of a stable deep MR with duration of more than 2 years in CML CP patients was 16 % (95% CI: 11–22 %) after 5 years of therapy, 29 % (95% CI: 22–37 %) after 7 years of therapy and 50 % (95% CI: 38–60 %) after 9 years of therapy. The cumulative incidence of a stable deep MR was significantly higher in those patients who had achieved a deep MR at 36 months of therapy compared to patients with only MMR: 40 % (95% CI: 28–53 %) vs. 3 % (95% CI: 0–13 %) at 5 year of therapy; 66 % (95% CI: 52–77 %) vs. 15 % (95% CI: 5–30 %) at 7 year and 89 % (95% CI: 64–97 %) vs. 48 % (95% CI: 25–67 %) at 9 year (p < 0.0001) in patients without MMR by 36 months. No patients without MMR at 36 months of therapy subsequently gained a stable deep MR. Fifty four patients met the TKI discontinuation criteria for transition into TFR phase: CP CML with a typical BCR::ABL1 p210 transcript, TKI therapy for more than 3 years and a stable deep MR for over 2 years. The rate of possible candidates for cancellation of therapy was 28 % of all 192 patients who received TKI in the study or 31 % in terms of patients with CP CML. Predominantly, patients with low-risk by Sokal or ELTS score were among the potential TFR candidates 26 (48 %) and 33 (61 %), respectively. No patients with long-term resistance to therapy were the TFR candidates. Conclusion. In the Russian portion of the prospective observational multicenter study EUTOS PBS, it was found that with a median duration of TKI therapy of 7 years, about a third of patients with CP CML may be candidates for the controlled therapy discontinuation. If half of these patients remain in molecular remission, up to 15 % of the initial number of patients will be able to continue observation in the TFR. Achievement of MMR and deep MR at 36 months of therapy is associated with a significantly greater likelihood of meeting the criteria for follow-up in the TFR phase in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".