Efficacity of tDCS in catatonic patients with Phelan McDermid syndrome, a case series
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a rare disorder characterized by deletion or mutation of the SHANK3 gene located in the chromosomal region 22q13.33. It is associated with catatonia in 53% of cases [[1]Kohlenberg T.M. Trelles M.P. McLarney B. Betancur C. Thurm A. Kolevzon A. Psychiatric illness and regression in individuals with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.J Neurodev Disord. 2020 Dec; 12: 7Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar]. In neurodevelopmental disorders like PMS, under-diagnosis and lack of prompt management lead to chronicity of the catatonic episode [[2]Benarous X. Raffin M. Ferrafiat V. Consoli A. Cohen D. Catatonia in children and adolescents: new perspectives.Schizophr Res. 2018 Oct; 200: 56-67Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar], a factor associated with poor therapeutic response to the two standard treatments: lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Despite Expert Therapeutic Recommendations (https://pmsf.org/), effective and well-tolerated cares for chronic catatonia in PMS are still lacking. Furthermore, in PMS, benzodiazepines such as lorazepam, while reducing catatonic symptoms, may increase impulsivity, psychomotor arousal, confusion and insomnia limiting the use of this treatment [[3]Kolevzon A. Delaby E. Berry-Kravis E. Buxbaum J.D. Betancur C. Neuropsychiatric decompensation in adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.Mol Autism. 2019 Dec; 10: 50Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar]. ECT is also sometimes not available or contraindicated. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), an easy-to-apply noninvasive brain stimulation technique, has been shown to be effective and safe in neurodevelopmental disorders [[4]García-González S. Lugo-Marín J. Setien-Ramos I. Gisbert-Gustemps L. Arteaga-Henríquez G. Díez-Villoria E. et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jul; 48: 89-109Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar] and in twelve cases of catatonic patients [[5]Haroche A. Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in catatonia: a review and case series.Front Psychiatr. 2022; 13: 9Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar]. In this letter, we present the efficacy and safety of tDCS in four cases of catatonia occurring on PMS. The four cases are described in Table 1. The catatonic episode was diagnosed by two different clinicians according to the DSM-5 criteria. Severity was assessed by the Bush and Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). All participants received the same tDCS protocol that we previously reported as effective for schizophrenia and bipolar patients with catatonia [[5]Haroche A. Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in catatonia: a review and case series.Front Psychiatr. 2022; 13: 9Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar], i.e. anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, midway between F3 and FP1) and cathode over the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ, midway between T3 and P3). Stimulation was performed using a DC-stimulator plus (Neuroconn) with two 7 × 5 cm sponge electrodes soaked in a 0.9% saline solution. The stimulation level was set at 2 mA for 20 minutes. The sessions were conducted twice daily (separated by at least 3 hours), except for one patient who received only one session per day (case 2) (see Table 1). The present study was authorized by the local ethics committee under reference number D22-R003.Table 1Cases description. Chronic = more than 6 months. ASD = autism spectrum disorder. ID = intellectual disability.Case/yearAge/GenderEvolution/Malignant featuresGenetic profileOther psychiatric diseasesLorazepam/dayOthers treatmentstDCS protocolBFCRS (/69) before/mid/after/dischargeBFCRS reduction mid/after/delay1/202021/MChronic/NoDe novo mutation intron/exon junctionASD, ID, bipolar disorder15mglithium 1000mg melatonine 6mg10 sessions 2/day21/NA/16/10NA/24%/52%2/202023/FChronic/NoDel 22q13.33 55,9KbDysphasia, bipolar disorder18mglithium 1000mg14 sessions 1/day35/24/16/733%/54%/80%3/202115/FChronic/NoDe novo nonsens mutASD, ID1mgmelatonine 3mg20 sessions 2/day16/10/5/NA50%/69%/NA4/202133/MChronic/NoDel 22q13.33 1,76MbASD, ID, bipolar disorder0mgnone30 sessions 2/day24/14/13/87%/46%/67% Open table in a new tab All four cases improved at each step of the tDCS course. After the last session of tDCS, the mean BFCRS reduction score was 48%, (range: 24%–69%). However, patients continued to improve after tDCS and at discharge the mean BFCRS reduction score was 66% (range: 52%–80%) (see Fig. 1). With a one-tailed Wilcoxon test, we found a statistical difference between the pre- and post-cure BFCRS scores (W = 15, p-value = 0.027) and between the pre- and discharge BFCRS score (W = 12, p-value = 0.029). Tolerance was optimal. The only adverse events described were tingling and fatigue, and vomiting which was observed in one patient after one session. In contrast to the pediatric catatonia rating scale, the BFCRS does not attribute points to regression symptoms that frequently occur in catatonia associated with genetic syndrome, underestimating the severity. This explains why the improvement reported by family and medical teams in the patients' environments was even greater than that measured by the BFCRS. Two out of 4 cases had a clear improvement of sphincter disorders at the end of the tDCS course. In all cases, tDCS resulted in an improvement of spontaneous speech. In one case, the patient was able to speak again after months of mutism, while in another case it improved his elocution and in a third one her vocabulary. The improvement in verbal language observed in some of these patients are similar to the improvement of post-stroke aphasia induced by tDCS treatment [[6]Elsner B. Kugler J. Pohl M. Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.Cochrane Stroke Group. 2019 May 21; (Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]) (CD009760. [cited 2022 Jun 13]; Available from: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub4): 1-93Google Scholar]. tDCS also resulted in tranquilization in all cases, with a strong reduction of impulsivity where lorazepam failed to improve in these particular patients with chronic catatonia [[3]Kolevzon A. Delaby E. Berry-Kravis E. Buxbaum J.D. Betancur C. Neuropsychiatric decompensation in adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.Mol Autism. 2019 Dec; 10: 50Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar]. Haploinsufficiency of SHANK3 appears to be associated with the risk of catatonic syndrome [[1]Kohlenberg T.M. Trelles M.P. McLarney B. Betancur C. Thurm A. Kolevzon A. Psychiatric illness and regression in individuals with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.J Neurodev Disord. 2020 Dec; 12: 7Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar]. SHANK3 encodes a scaffolding protein of the postsynaptic density of glutamatergic excitatory synapses and its deficiency induces NMDA receptor (NMDAR) hypofunctionality [[7]Duffney L.J. Wei J. Cheng J. Liu W. Smith K.R. Kittler J.T. et al.Shank3 deficiency induces NMDA receptor hypofunction via an actin-dependent mechanism.J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2; 33: 15767-15778Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar]. Several authors argue for hypofunctionality of the glutamatergic system in catatonia [[8]Rogers J.P. Pollak T.A. Blackman G. David A.S. Catatonia and the immune system: a review.Lancet Psychiatr. 2019 Jul; 6: 620-630Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar]; while this system seems to have a crucial role in the neuroplasticity induced by tDCS [[9]Hunter M.A. Coffman B.A. Gasparovic C. Calhoun V.D. Trumbo M.C. Clark V.P. Baseline effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on glutamatergic neurotransmission and large-scale network connectivity.Brain Res. 2015 Jan; 1594: 92-107Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar]. In the case of catatonia associated with PMS, the action of tDCS on the glutamatergic system and in particular on NMDARs could be particularly important for the resolution of the episode. Moreover, we observe in this case series a persistent effect over time after treatment with tDCS. The hypothesis is that tDCS leads to long-lasting long term potentiation (LTP) inducing meta-plasticity lasting for weeks [[10]Cirillo G. Di Pino G. Capone F. Ranieri F. Florio L. Todisco V. et al.Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan; 10: 1-18Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar]. However, two out of 4 cases (cases 1 and 2) showed a relapse of catatonia after several months, which argue for the interest of repetitive tDCS seances as it happens with some cases responsive to ECT. With the observational design, we cannot exclude the placebo effect or confounding factors such as drugs, even though patients have very few treatments and no change during the duration of the whole protocol. The two patients receiving lithium during the tDCS course had a very good therapeutic response. Indeed, lithium is most likely to enhance tDCS efficacy as it does with rTMS [[11]Martinotti G. Montemitro C. Pettorruso M. Viceconte D. Alessi M.C. Di Carlo F. et al.Augmenting pharmacotherapy with neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of bipolar disorder: a focus on the effects of mood stabilizers on cortical excitability.Expet Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Sep 2; 20: 1575-1588Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar] even though more studies are needed to evaluate the effect of lithium on tDCS. Two patients (cases 3 and 4) received low or no dose of benzodiazepine, mainly because of paradoxical agitation. Case 3, with the lowest dose of lorazepam per day, had the best BFCRS score reduction at the end of tDCS treatment. We can hypothesize that the poorer response of patients with higher doses of lorazepam is due to the well-known reduced efficacy of tDCS under benzodiazepines [[12]Goerigk S.A. Padberg F. Bühner M. Sarubin N. Kaster T.S. Daskalakis Z.J. et al.Distinct trajectories of response to prefrontal tDCS in major depression: results from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar; 46: 774-782Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar]. Our results suggest that the optimal treatment is about 20 sessions combined with lithium and benzodiazepine discontinuation on the morning of the tDCS sessions. Despite the need for further studies to confirm the results, tDCS seems to be a good and safe therapeutic strategy for chronic catatonia in patients with PMS. The Authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study. The present study was authorized by the local ethics committee under reference number D22-R003.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».