MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307658828 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2022.10.005

Efficacity of tDCS in catatonic patients with Phelan McDermid syndrome, a case series

2022· letter· en· W4307658828 on OpenAlexaff
Mylène Moyal, Marion Plaze, Ambre Baruchet, David Attali, Cora Cravero, Marie Raffin, Angèle Consoli, Doron Cohen, Alexandre Haroche, Boris Chaumette

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatatoniaElectroconvulsive therapyPsychiatryMedicineManiaIntellectual disabilitySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PediatricsPsychologyBipolar disorderMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a rare disorder characterized by deletion or mutation of the SHANK3 gene located in the chromosomal region 22q13.33. It is associated with catatonia in 53% of cases [[1]Kohlenberg T.M. Trelles M.P. McLarney B. Betancur C. Thurm A. Kolevzon A. Psychiatric illness and regression in individuals with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.J Neurodev Disord. 2020 Dec; 12: 7Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar]. In neurodevelopmental disorders like PMS, under-diagnosis and lack of prompt management lead to chronicity of the catatonic episode [[2]Benarous X. Raffin M. Ferrafiat V. Consoli A. Cohen D. Catatonia in children and adolescents: new perspectives.Schizophr Res. 2018 Oct; 200: 56-67Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar], a factor associated with poor therapeutic response to the two standard treatments: lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Despite Expert Therapeutic Recommendations (https://pmsf.org/), effective and well-tolerated cares for chronic catatonia in PMS are still lacking. Furthermore, in PMS, benzodiazepines such as lorazepam, while reducing catatonic symptoms, may increase impulsivity, psychomotor arousal, confusion and insomnia limiting the use of this treatment [[3]Kolevzon A. Delaby E. Berry-Kravis E. Buxbaum J.D. Betancur C. Neuropsychiatric decompensation in adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.Mol Autism. 2019 Dec; 10: 50Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar]. ECT is also sometimes not available or contraindicated. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), an easy-to-apply noninvasive brain stimulation technique, has been shown to be effective and safe in neurodevelopmental disorders [[4]García-González S. Lugo-Marín J. Setien-Ramos I. Gisbert-Gustemps L. Arteaga-Henríquez G. Díez-Villoria E. et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jul; 48: 89-109Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar] and in twelve cases of catatonic patients [[5]Haroche A. Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in catatonia: a review and case series.Front Psychiatr. 2022; 13: 9Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar]. In this letter, we present the efficacy and safety of tDCS in four cases of catatonia occurring on PMS. The four cases are described in Table 1. The catatonic episode was diagnosed by two different clinicians according to the DSM-5 criteria. Severity was assessed by the Bush and Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). All participants received the same tDCS protocol that we previously reported as effective for schizophrenia and bipolar patients with catatonia [[5]Haroche A. Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in catatonia: a review and case series.Front Psychiatr. 2022; 13: 9Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar], i.e. anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, midway between F3 and FP1) and cathode over the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ, midway between T3 and P3). Stimulation was performed using a DC-stimulator plus (Neuroconn) with two 7 × 5 cm sponge electrodes soaked in a 0.9% saline solution. The stimulation level was set at 2 mA for 20 minutes. The sessions were conducted twice daily (separated by at least 3 hours), except for one patient who received only one session per day (case 2) (see Table 1). The present study was authorized by the local ethics committee under reference number D22-R003.Table 1Cases description. Chronic = more than 6 months. ASD = autism spectrum disorder. ID = intellectual disability.Case/yearAge/GenderEvolution/Malignant featuresGenetic profileOther psychiatric diseasesLorazepam/dayOthers treatmentstDCS protocolBFCRS (/69) before/mid/after/dischargeBFCRS reduction mid/after/delay1/202021/MChronic/NoDe novo mutation intron/exon junctionASD, ID, bipolar disorder15mglithium 1000mg melatonine 6mg10 sessions 2/day21/NA/16/10NA/24%/52%2/202023/FChronic/NoDel 22q13.33 55,9KbDysphasia, bipolar disorder18mglithium 1000mg14 sessions 1/day35/24/16/733%/54%/80%3/202115/FChronic/NoDe novo nonsens mutASD, ID1mgmelatonine 3mg20 sessions 2/day16/10/5/NA50%/69%/NA4/202133/MChronic/NoDel 22q13.33 1,76MbASD, ID, bipolar disorder0mgnone30 sessions 2/day24/14/13/87%/46%/67% Open table in a new tab All four cases improved at each step of the tDCS course. After the last session of tDCS, the mean BFCRS reduction score was 48%, (range: 24%–69%). However, patients continued to improve after tDCS and at discharge the mean BFCRS reduction score was 66% (range: 52%–80%) (see Fig. 1). With a one-tailed Wilcoxon test, we found a statistical difference between the pre- and post-cure BFCRS scores (W = 15, p-value = 0.027) and between the pre- and discharge BFCRS score (W = 12, p-value = 0.029). Tolerance was optimal. The only adverse events described were tingling and fatigue, and vomiting which was observed in one patient after one session. In contrast to the pediatric catatonia rating scale, the BFCRS does not attribute points to regression symptoms that frequently occur in catatonia associated with genetic syndrome, underestimating the severity. This explains why the improvement reported by family and medical teams in the patients' environments was even greater than that measured by the BFCRS. Two out of 4 cases had a clear improvement of sphincter disorders at the end of the tDCS course. In all cases, tDCS resulted in an improvement of spontaneous speech. In one case, the patient was able to speak again after months of mutism, while in another case it improved his elocution and in a third one her vocabulary. The improvement in verbal language observed in some of these patients are similar to the improvement of post-stroke aphasia induced by tDCS treatment [[6]Elsner B. Kugler J. Pohl M. Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.Cochrane Stroke Group. 2019 May 21; (Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]) (CD009760. [cited 2022 Jun 13]; Available from: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub4): 1-93Google Scholar]. tDCS also resulted in tranquilization in all cases, with a strong reduction of impulsivity where lorazepam failed to improve in these particular patients with chronic catatonia [[3]Kolevzon A. Delaby E. Berry-Kravis E. Buxbaum J.D. Betancur C. Neuropsychiatric decompensation in adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.Mol Autism. 2019 Dec; 10: 50Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar]. Haploinsufficiency of SHANK3 appears to be associated with the risk of catatonic syndrome [[1]Kohlenberg T.M. Trelles M.P. McLarney B. Betancur C. Thurm A. Kolevzon A. Psychiatric illness and regression in individuals with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.J Neurodev Disord. 2020 Dec; 12: 7Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar]. SHANK3 encodes a scaffolding protein of the postsynaptic density of glutamatergic excitatory synapses and its deficiency induces NMDA receptor (NMDAR) hypofunctionality [[7]Duffney L.J. Wei J. Cheng J. Liu W. Smith K.R. Kittler J.T. et al.Shank3 deficiency induces NMDA receptor hypofunction via an actin-dependent mechanism.J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2; 33: 15767-15778Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar]. Several authors argue for hypofunctionality of the glutamatergic system in catatonia [[8]Rogers J.P. Pollak T.A. Blackman G. David A.S. Catatonia and the immune system: a review.Lancet Psychiatr. 2019 Jul; 6: 620-630Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar]; while this system seems to have a crucial role in the neuroplasticity induced by tDCS [[9]Hunter M.A. Coffman B.A. Gasparovic C. Calhoun V.D. Trumbo M.C. Clark V.P. Baseline effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on glutamatergic neurotransmission and large-scale network connectivity.Brain Res. 2015 Jan; 1594: 92-107Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar]. In the case of catatonia associated with PMS, the action of tDCS on the glutamatergic system and in particular on NMDARs could be particularly important for the resolution of the episode. Moreover, we observe in this case series a persistent effect over time after treatment with tDCS. The hypothesis is that tDCS leads to long-lasting long term potentiation (LTP) inducing meta-plasticity lasting for weeks [[10]Cirillo G. Di Pino G. Capone F. Ranieri F. Florio L. Todisco V. et al.Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan; 10: 1-18Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar]. However, two out of 4 cases (cases 1 and 2) showed a relapse of catatonia after several months, which argue for the interest of repetitive tDCS seances as it happens with some cases responsive to ECT. With the observational design, we cannot exclude the placebo effect or confounding factors such as drugs, even though patients have very few treatments and no change during the duration of the whole protocol. The two patients receiving lithium during the tDCS course had a very good therapeutic response. Indeed, lithium is most likely to enhance tDCS efficacy as it does with rTMS [[11]Martinotti G. Montemitro C. Pettorruso M. Viceconte D. Alessi M.C. Di Carlo F. et al.Augmenting pharmacotherapy with neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of bipolar disorder: a focus on the effects of mood stabilizers on cortical excitability.Expet Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Sep 2; 20: 1575-1588Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar] even though more studies are needed to evaluate the effect of lithium on tDCS. Two patients (cases 3 and 4) received low or no dose of benzodiazepine, mainly because of paradoxical agitation. Case 3, with the lowest dose of lorazepam per day, had the best BFCRS score reduction at the end of tDCS treatment. We can hypothesize that the poorer response of patients with higher doses of lorazepam is due to the well-known reduced efficacy of tDCS under benzodiazepines [[12]Goerigk S.A. Padberg F. Bühner M. Sarubin N. Kaster T.S. Daskalakis Z.J. et al.Distinct trajectories of response to prefrontal tDCS in major depression: results from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar; 46: 774-782Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar]. Our results suggest that the optimal treatment is about 20 sessions combined with lithium and benzodiazepine discontinuation on the morning of the tDCS sessions. Despite the need for further studies to confirm the results, tDCS seems to be a good and safe therapeutic strategy for chronic catatonia in patients with PMS. The Authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study. The present study was authorized by the local ethics committee under reference number D22-R003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesFrench-language works237,207