MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4308377062 · doi:10.1136/jitc-2022-sitc2022.0009

9 A pan-cancer multi-omic immune single-cell atlas for cancer immunotherapy: focus on CD4+ T cells

2022· article· en· W4308377062 sur OpenAlexaff
Lydia Mok, Andrea Orlando, Julian Lehrer, Joshua M. Stuart, Nils-Petter Rudqvist, Benjamin G. Vincent, Anne Monette, Yasin Şenbabaoğlu, Kellie N. Smith, Paul Thomas, Nicholas Tschernia, Vésteinn Thorsson, Roberta Zappasodi, Vanessa D. Jönsson

Notice bibliographique

RevueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Établissements canadiensJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesNational Cancer InstituteSociety for Immunotherapy of CancerParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyAstraZenecaBristol-Myers Squibb
Mots-clésImmunotherapyCancer immunotherapyT cellImmune systemComputational biologyCD8MetadataCancerTranscriptomeBiologyComputer scienceImmunologyGene expressionWorld Wide WebGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Despite the success of immunotherapy, clinical responses remain difficult to predict, likely due to diverging tumor immune cell composition and function. Advances in single-cell analysis have revealed heterogeneous immune cell activity within and across individuals with cancer. While CD8+ ?tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been extensively studied,<sup>1–4</sup> a pan-cancer consensus annotation of CD4+ TIL in immunotherapy is lacking. Robust identification of CD4+ T-cells from admixed single-cell transcriptomes is challenging due to low CD4 transcript expression and CD4+CD8+ T cells. Poor harmonization of CD4+ T-cell annotations across datasets compromises reproducibility and generalization. Here, we present the Cancer Immunotherapy T-cell Atlas (CITA), a harmonized, metadata-rich, pan-cancer, single-cell omics resource, spanning over 1.3M T cells, aimed at discovering CD4+ T-cell related features impacting immunotherapy response. <h3>Methods</h3> Publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data were used to generate the CD4+ T-cell consensus re-annotation and the CITA. Raw count data and metadata were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) or manuscript supplementary data. Individual datasets were processed using standardized bioinformatics workflow for quality control, integration, normalization, and batch correction. <h3>Results</h3> We collected scRNAseq data and clinical metadata from 23 published datasets from 320 donors, across 30 different cancers, 20 immunotherapies, and from diverse tissue types and sequencing platforms<sup>3,5–25</sup> (figure 1). Existing immune cell annotations were harmonized by mapping to our reference cell identity labels, and T cells were subsetted for the CITA. To enable consensus-driven annotation, we resolved precise CD4+ T-cell transcriptional profiles from publicly available, FACS-sorted CD4+ T-cell scRNAseq datasets from liver, lung, and colorectal cancers.<sup>21,22,26</sup> We found CD4+ T cells homogeneously distributed in 12 main clusters across cancer types (figure 2). Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) segregated into circulating/naive, tissue-resident, and effector Tregs, consistent with prior studies.<sup>27</sup> Moreover, we resolved naive, central, effector, tissue-resident, activated, and highly proliferating CD4+Foxp3- T cells, as well as Tbet+ Th1, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, co-expressing cytotoxic or canonical Tfh genes respectively (figure 2). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The CITA provides the foundation for pan-cancer, harmonized, metadata-rich compendium of single-cell omics T-cell data from treatment-naive and immunotherapy-treated patients. Our CD4+ T-cell consensus re-annotation in conjunction with existing and new machine-learning-based classification methods automates annotation of new and existing CD4+T-cell datasets. CITA will be a publicly available software and data resource at http://cita.cells.ucsc.edu and will include new datasets as they are released. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> We thank SITC Sparkathon for supporting this work. L.M. is supported by the Regents fellowship for the Program in Biomedical Sciences &amp; Engineering, Biomolecular Engineering &amp; Bioinformatics Ph.D. at the University of California, Santa Cruz. R.Z. is supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Bridge Fellows Award. R.Z. acknowledges funding from the NCI SPORE (P50-CA192937) and the Leukemia &amp; Lymphoma Society and receives grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. <h3>References</h3> Giles JR, Manne S, Freilich E, Oldridge DA, Baxter AE, George S, <i>et al</i>. Human epigenetic and transcriptional T cell differentiation atlas for identifying functional T cell-specific enhancers. <i>Immunity</i>. 2022;<b>55</b>: 557–574.e7. Developmental Relationships of Four Exhausted CD8+ T Cell Subsets Reveals Underlying Transcriptional and Epigenetic Landscape Control Mechanisms. <i>Immunity</i>. 2020;<b>52</b>: 825–841.e8. Zheng L, Qin S, Si W, Wang A, Xing B, Gao R, <i>et al</i>. Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cells. <i>Science</i>. 2021;<b>374</b>: abe6474. Leun AM van der, van der Leun AM, Thommen DS, Schumacher TN. CD8 T cell states in human cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. <i>Nature Reviews Cancer</i>. 2020. pp. 218–232. doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0235-4. Jerby-Arnon L, Shah P, Cuoco MS, Rodman C, Su M-J, Melms JC, <i>et al</i>. A Cancer Cell Program Promotes T Cell Exclusion and Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade.<i> Cell</i>. 2018. pp. 984–997.e24. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.006. Zhang L, Yu X, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fang Q, <i>et al</i>. Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. <i>Nature</i>. 2018;<b>564</b>: 268–272. Azizi E, Carr AJ, Plitas G, Cornish AE, Konopacki C, Prabhakaran S, <i>et al</i>. Single-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment. <i>Cell</i>. 2018;<b>174</b>: 1293–1308.e36. Borcherding N, Vishwakarma A, Voigt AP, Bellizzi A, Kaplan J, Nepple K, <i>et al</i>. Mapping the immune environment in clear cell renal carcinoma by single-cell genomics. <i>Commun Biol</i>. 2021;<b>4</b>: 122. Li H, van der Leun AM, Yofe I, Lubling Y, Gelbard-Solodkin D, van Akkooi ACJ, <i>et al</i>. Dysfunctional CD8 T Cells Form a Proliferative, Dynamically Regulated Compartment within Human Melanoma. <i>Cell</i>. 2020. p. 747. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.017. Yost KE, Satpathy AT, Wells DK, Qi Y, Wang C, Kageyama R, <i>et al</i>. Clonal replacement of tumor-specific T cells following PD-1 blockade. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2019;<b>25</b>: 1251–1259. Ma L, Hernandez MO, Zhao Y, Mehta M, Tran B, Kelly M, <i>et al</i>. Tumor Cell Biodiversity Drives Microenvironmental Reprogramming in Liver Cancer. <i>Cancer Cell</i>. 2019;<b>36</b>: 418–430.e6. Zilionis R, Engblom C, Pfirschke C, Savova V, Zemmour D, Saatcioglu HD, <i>et al</i>. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Lung Cancers Reveals Conserved Myeloid Populations across Individuals and Species. <i>Immunity</i>. 2019;<b>50</b>: 1317–1334.e10. Vieira Braga FA, Kar G, Berg M, Carpaij OA, Polanski K, Simon LM, <i>et al</i>. A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2019;<b>25</b>: 1153–1163. Wu TD, Madireddi S, de Almeida PE, Banchereau R, Chen Y-JJ, Chitre AS, <i>et al</i>. Peripheral T cell expansion predicts tumour infiltration and clinical response. <i>Nature</i>. 2020;<b>579</b>: 274–278. Mahuron KM, Moreau JM, Glasgow JE, Boda DP, Pauli ML, Gouirand V, <i>et al</i>. Layilin augments integrin activation to promote antitumor immunity. <i>J Exp Med</i>. 2020;<b>217</b>. doi:10.1084/jem.20192080 Mathewson ND, Ashenberg O, Tirosh I, Gritsch S, Perez EM, Marx S, <i>et al</i>. Inhibitory CD161 receptor identified in glioma-infiltrating T cells by single-cell analysis. <i>Cell</i>. 2021;<b>184</b>: 1281–1298.e26. Wu SZ, Al-Eryani G, Roden DL, Junankar S, Harvey K, Andersson A, <i>et al</i>. A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers. <i>Nat Genet</i>. 2021;<b>53</b>: 1334–1347. Liu B, Hu X, Feng K, Gao R, Xue Z, Zhang S, <i>et al</i>. Temporal single-cell tracing reveals clonal revival and expansion of precursor exhausted T cells during anti-PD-1 therapy in lung cancer. <i>Nat Cancer</i>. 2022;<b>3</b>: 108–121. Steen CB, Luca BA, Esfahani MS, Azizi A, Sworder BJ, Nabet BY, <i>et al</i>. The landscape of tumor cell states and ecosystems in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. <i>Cancer Cell</i>. 2021;<b>39</b>: 1422–1437.e10. Schad SE, Chow A, Mangarin L, Pan H, Zhang J, Ceglia N, <i>et al</i>. Tumor-induced double positive T cells display distinct lineage commitment mechanisms and functions. <i>J Exp Med</i>. 2022;<b>219</b>. doi:10.1084/jem.20212169. Zheng C, Zheng L, Yoo J-K, Guo H, Zhang Y, Guo X, <i>et al</i>. Landscape of Infiltrating T Cells in Liver Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell Sequencing. <i>Cell</i>. 2017;<b>169</b>: 1342–1356.e16. Guo X, Zhang Y, Zheng L, Zheng C, Song J, Zhang Q, <i>et al</i>. Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2018;<b>24</b>: 978–985. Tirosh I, Venteicher AS, Hebert C, Escalante LE, Patel AP, Yizhak K, <i>et al</i>. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. <i>Nature</i>. 2016;<b>539</b>: 309–313. Caushi JX, Zhang J, Ji Z, Vaghasia A, Zhang B, Hsiue EH-C, <i>et al</i>. Transcriptional programs of neoantigen-specific TIL in anti-PD-1-treated lung cancers. <i>Nature</i>. 2021;<b>596</b>: 126–132. Oliveira G, Stromhaug K, Cieri N, Iorgulescu JB, Klaeger S, Wolff JO, <i>et al</i>. Landscape of helper and regulatory antitumour CD4 T cells in melanoma. <i>Nature</i>. 2022;<b>605</b>: 532–538. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Zhang L, Hu X, Ren X, Zhang Z. Deep single-cell RNA sequencing data of individual T cells from treatment-naïve colorectal cancer patients. <i>Sci Data</i>. 2019;<b>6</b>: 131. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Regulatory T Cells Reveals Trajectories of Tissue Adaptation. <i>Immunity</i>. 2019;<b>50</b>: 493–504.e7.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsMême sujetSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsTravaux en français237 207