MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

9 A pan-cancer multi-omic immune single-cell atlas for cancer immunotherapy: focus on CD4+ T cells

2022· article· en· W4308377062 on OpenAlexaff
Lydia Mok, Andrea Orlando, Julian Lehrer, Joshua M. Stuart, Nils-Petter Rudqvist, Benjamin G. Vincent, Anne Monette, Yasin Şenbabaoğlu, Kellie N. Smith, Paul Thomas, Nicholas Tschernia, Vésteinn Thorsson, Roberta Zappasodi, Vanessa D. Jönsson

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteSociety for Immunotherapy of CancerParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyAstraZenecaBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsImmunotherapyCancer immunotherapyT cellImmune systemComputational biologyCD8MetadataCancerTranscriptomeBiologyComputer scienceImmunologyGene expressionWorld Wide WebGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Despite the success of immunotherapy, clinical responses remain difficult to predict, likely due to diverging tumor immune cell composition and function. Advances in single-cell analysis have revealed heterogeneous immune cell activity within and across individuals with cancer. While CD8+ ?tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been extensively studied,<sup>1–4</sup> a pan-cancer consensus annotation of CD4+ TIL in immunotherapy is lacking. Robust identification of CD4+ T-cells from admixed single-cell transcriptomes is challenging due to low CD4 transcript expression and CD4+CD8+ T cells. Poor harmonization of CD4+ T-cell annotations across datasets compromises reproducibility and generalization. Here, we present the Cancer Immunotherapy T-cell Atlas (CITA), a harmonized, metadata-rich, pan-cancer, single-cell omics resource, spanning over 1.3M T cells, aimed at discovering CD4+ T-cell related features impacting immunotherapy response. <h3>Methods</h3> Publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data were used to generate the CD4+ T-cell consensus re-annotation and the CITA. Raw count data and metadata were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) or manuscript supplementary data. Individual datasets were processed using standardized bioinformatics workflow for quality control, integration, normalization, and batch correction. <h3>Results</h3> We collected scRNAseq data and clinical metadata from 23 published datasets from 320 donors, across 30 different cancers, 20 immunotherapies, and from diverse tissue types and sequencing platforms<sup>3,5–25</sup> (figure 1). Existing immune cell annotations were harmonized by mapping to our reference cell identity labels, and T cells were subsetted for the CITA. To enable consensus-driven annotation, we resolved precise CD4+ T-cell transcriptional profiles from publicly available, FACS-sorted CD4+ T-cell scRNAseq datasets from liver, lung, and colorectal cancers.<sup>21,22,26</sup> We found CD4+ T cells homogeneously distributed in 12 main clusters across cancer types (figure 2). Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) segregated into circulating/naive, tissue-resident, and effector Tregs, consistent with prior studies.<sup>27</sup> Moreover, we resolved naive, central, effector, tissue-resident, activated, and highly proliferating CD4+Foxp3- T cells, as well as Tbet+ Th1, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, co-expressing cytotoxic or canonical Tfh genes respectively (figure 2). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The CITA provides the foundation for pan-cancer, harmonized, metadata-rich compendium of single-cell omics T-cell data from treatment-naive and immunotherapy-treated patients. Our CD4+ T-cell consensus re-annotation in conjunction with existing and new machine-learning-based classification methods automates annotation of new and existing CD4+T-cell datasets. CITA will be a publicly available software and data resource at http://cita.cells.ucsc.edu and will include new datasets as they are released. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> We thank SITC Sparkathon for supporting this work. L.M. is supported by the Regents fellowship for the Program in Biomedical Sciences &amp; Engineering, Biomolecular Engineering &amp; Bioinformatics Ph.D. at the University of California, Santa Cruz. R.Z. is supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Bridge Fellows Award. R.Z. acknowledges funding from the NCI SPORE (P50-CA192937) and the Leukemia &amp; Lymphoma Society and receives grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. <h3>References</h3> Giles JR, Manne S, Freilich E, Oldridge DA, Baxter AE, George S, <i>et al</i>. Human epigenetic and transcriptional T cell differentiation atlas for identifying functional T cell-specific enhancers. <i>Immunity</i>. 2022;<b>55</b>: 557–574.e7. Developmental Relationships of Four Exhausted CD8+ T Cell Subsets Reveals Underlying Transcriptional and Epigenetic Landscape Control Mechanisms. <i>Immunity</i>. 2020;<b>52</b>: 825–841.e8. Zheng L, Qin S, Si W, Wang A, Xing B, Gao R, <i>et al</i>. Pan-cancer single-cell landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cells. <i>Science</i>. 2021;<b>374</b>: abe6474. Leun AM van der, van der Leun AM, Thommen DS, Schumacher TN. CD8 T cell states in human cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. <i>Nature Reviews Cancer</i>. 2020. pp. 218–232. doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0235-4. Jerby-Arnon L, Shah P, Cuoco MS, Rodman C, Su M-J, Melms JC, <i>et al</i>. A Cancer Cell Program Promotes T Cell Exclusion and Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade.<i> Cell</i>. 2018. pp. 984–997.e24. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.006. Zhang L, Yu X, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fang Q, <i>et al</i>. Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. <i>Nature</i>. 2018;<b>564</b>: 268–272. Azizi E, Carr AJ, Plitas G, Cornish AE, Konopacki C, Prabhakaran S, <i>et al</i>. Single-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment. <i>Cell</i>. 2018;<b>174</b>: 1293–1308.e36. Borcherding N, Vishwakarma A, Voigt AP, Bellizzi A, Kaplan J, Nepple K, <i>et al</i>. Mapping the immune environment in clear cell renal carcinoma by single-cell genomics. <i>Commun Biol</i>. 2021;<b>4</b>: 122. Li H, van der Leun AM, Yofe I, Lubling Y, Gelbard-Solodkin D, van Akkooi ACJ, <i>et al</i>. Dysfunctional CD8 T Cells Form a Proliferative, Dynamically Regulated Compartment within Human Melanoma. <i>Cell</i>. 2020. p. 747. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.017. Yost KE, Satpathy AT, Wells DK, Qi Y, Wang C, Kageyama R, <i>et al</i>. Clonal replacement of tumor-specific T cells following PD-1 blockade. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2019;<b>25</b>: 1251–1259. Ma L, Hernandez MO, Zhao Y, Mehta M, Tran B, Kelly M, <i>et al</i>. Tumor Cell Biodiversity Drives Microenvironmental Reprogramming in Liver Cancer. <i>Cancer Cell</i>. 2019;<b>36</b>: 418–430.e6. Zilionis R, Engblom C, Pfirschke C, Savova V, Zemmour D, Saatcioglu HD, <i>et al</i>. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Lung Cancers Reveals Conserved Myeloid Populations across Individuals and Species. <i>Immunity</i>. 2019;<b>50</b>: 1317–1334.e10. Vieira Braga FA, Kar G, Berg M, Carpaij OA, Polanski K, Simon LM, <i>et al</i>. A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2019;<b>25</b>: 1153–1163. Wu TD, Madireddi S, de Almeida PE, Banchereau R, Chen Y-JJ, Chitre AS, <i>et al</i>. Peripheral T cell expansion predicts tumour infiltration and clinical response. <i>Nature</i>. 2020;<b>579</b>: 274–278. Mahuron KM, Moreau JM, Glasgow JE, Boda DP, Pauli ML, Gouirand V, <i>et al</i>. Layilin augments integrin activation to promote antitumor immunity. <i>J Exp Med</i>. 2020;<b>217</b>. doi:10.1084/jem.20192080 Mathewson ND, Ashenberg O, Tirosh I, Gritsch S, Perez EM, Marx S, <i>et al</i>. Inhibitory CD161 receptor identified in glioma-infiltrating T cells by single-cell analysis. <i>Cell</i>. 2021;<b>184</b>: 1281–1298.e26. Wu SZ, Al-Eryani G, Roden DL, Junankar S, Harvey K, Andersson A, <i>et al</i>. A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers. <i>Nat Genet</i>. 2021;<b>53</b>: 1334–1347. Liu B, Hu X, Feng K, Gao R, Xue Z, Zhang S, <i>et al</i>. Temporal single-cell tracing reveals clonal revival and expansion of precursor exhausted T cells during anti-PD-1 therapy in lung cancer. <i>Nat Cancer</i>. 2022;<b>3</b>: 108–121. Steen CB, Luca BA, Esfahani MS, Azizi A, Sworder BJ, Nabet BY, <i>et al</i>. The landscape of tumor cell states and ecosystems in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. <i>Cancer Cell</i>. 2021;<b>39</b>: 1422–1437.e10. Schad SE, Chow A, Mangarin L, Pan H, Zhang J, Ceglia N, <i>et al</i>. Tumor-induced double positive T cells display distinct lineage commitment mechanisms and functions. <i>J Exp Med</i>. 2022;<b>219</b>. doi:10.1084/jem.20212169. Zheng C, Zheng L, Yoo J-K, Guo H, Zhang Y, Guo X, <i>et al</i>. Landscape of Infiltrating T Cells in Liver Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell Sequencing. <i>Cell</i>. 2017;<b>169</b>: 1342–1356.e16. Guo X, Zhang Y, Zheng L, Zheng C, Song J, Zhang Q, <i>et al</i>. Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing. <i>Nat Med</i>. 2018;<b>24</b>: 978–985. Tirosh I, Venteicher AS, Hebert C, Escalante LE, Patel AP, Yizhak K, <i>et al</i>. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. <i>Nature</i>. 2016;<b>539</b>: 309–313. Caushi JX, Zhang J, Ji Z, Vaghasia A, Zhang B, Hsiue EH-C, <i>et al</i>. Transcriptional programs of neoantigen-specific TIL in anti-PD-1-treated lung cancers. <i>Nature</i>. 2021;<b>596</b>: 126–132. Oliveira G, Stromhaug K, Cieri N, Iorgulescu JB, Klaeger S, Wolff JO, <i>et al</i>. Landscape of helper and regulatory antitumour CD4 T cells in melanoma. <i>Nature</i>. 2022;<b>605</b>: 532–538. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Zhang L, Hu X, Ren X, Zhang Z. Deep single-cell RNA sequencing data of individual T cells from treatment-naïve colorectal cancer patients. <i>Sci Data</i>. 2019;<b>6</b>: 131. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Regulatory T Cells Reveals Trajectories of Tissue Adaptation. <i>Immunity</i>. 2019;<b>50</b>: 493–504.e7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207