MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4309318166 · doi:10.25251/skin.6.supp.63

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: correlations between patient-reported outcomes and clinical responses in the phase 3 clinical trials POETYK PSO-1 and POETYK PSO-2

2022· article· en· W4309318166 sur OpenAlexaff
April W. Armstrong, Kim Papp, Joe Zhuo, Brandon Becker, Yichen Zhong, Jennifer L. Beaumont, Michael DeRosa, Renata M Kisa, Subhashis Banerjee, Bruce Strober

Notice bibliographique

RevueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Établissements canadiensProbity Medical Research
Organismes subventionnairesBristol-Myers Squibb
Mots-clésPlaque psoriasisMedicineClinical trialPsoriasisInternal medicineAllosteric regulationDermatologyOncology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the phase 3 clinical trials POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2, deucravacitinib was compared for effi cacy and safety with placebo and apremilast in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis 1 -Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy -In each clinical trial, greater proportions of patients who received deucravacitinib achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) 1 and static Physician's Global Assessment scores of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1), 1 and showed meaningful improvements on Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) total scores (≥25 points) 2 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total scores (≥4 points) 3 compared with patients receiving placebo or apremilast • In this post hoc analysis of data pooled from both trials, clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were found to be correlated • When analyzed by the deucravacitinib or placebo treatment arm, greater proportions of patients who received deucravacitinib reported symptom reduction and improved quality of life, both in patients who did and who did not achieve PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 responses Objective • To explore the correlations between responses on clinical and PRO measures in pooled data from POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 Methods • In POETYK PSO-1 (N = 666) and PSO-2 (N = 1020) adults (aged ≥18 years) with moderate to severe psoriasis were randomized 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, placebo, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily -At Week 16 in each trial, patients who received placebo crossed over to deucravacitinib • Using data pooled from both trials, we evaluated the correlation between responses measured by PASI and sPGA on one hand, and the PRO measures PSSD (≥25 points) 2 and DLQI (≥4 points) 3 on the other -The analysis populations for the PSSD and DLQI included all patients from the full analysis set who completed ≥1 item on the respective questionnaire at baseline and ≥1 post-baseline visit • At baseline, 1659 patients had a DLQI score recorded and 1553 had a PSSD score recorded • Spearman correlation coeffi cients between clinical and PRO score changes from baseline to Week 16 were calculated with all treatment groups combined • Mean PSSD and DLQI scores were determined within relative PASI and sPGA response levels • The proportions of patients achieving meaningful improvement (ie, response) in PSSD total scores and on the DLQI were summarized by whether they did or did not achieve PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1, and were further analyzed by treatment arm -Results are reported for patients receiving deucravacitinib or placeboOutcome measures • PASI -Clinician evaluated -Range: 0-72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease • sPGA -Clinician evaluated -Range: 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) • PSSD -Patient rated -5 skin symptoms (itch, tightness, burning, stinging, and pain) and 6 skin signs (dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding/fl aking, redness, and bleeding) associated with psoriasis were rated 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable); averages within each domain were multiplied by 10, then averaged across both domains to obtain a total score -Range: 0-100, with higher scores indicating heavier disease burden • DLQI -Patient rated -10 questions that assess the extent to which skin disease affects patients' lives -Range: 0-30, with higher scores indicating more severe impact of disease Results Correlations between clinical and PRO measures • At Week 16, change from baseline in relative PASI score was correlated with changes in the PSSD total score (Spearman's rank correlation coeffi cient [r s ] = 0.536) and DLQI total score (r s = 0.421) in the total study population • At Week 16, change from baseline in sPGA score was correlated with changes in the PSSD total score (r s = 0.496) and DLQI total score (r s = 0.380) in the total study population • Higher PASI or sPGA response was associated with greater PSSD and DLQI responses at Weeks 16, 24, and 52 in the total study population (Figures 1-4) • This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb • Medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Eleanor Bush, MA, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,128
Tête enseignante GPT0,443
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine→Même sujetCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→