MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310104796 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-158370

Preliminary Results from a Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (TWT-202)

2022· article· en· W4310104796 sur OpenAlexaff
Brian A. Jonas, Karen Yee, Paul Koller, Joseph Brandwein, Alice S. Mims, Glenn Michelson, Linh Nguyen, Mark R. Bray, Emily L Roberts-Thomson, Gautam Borthakur

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPharmacokineticsTolerabilityPharmacodynamicsPharmacologyMedicineClinical trialPhases of clinical researchAdverse effectInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master upstream regulator of centriole duplication and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in centrosome amplification, often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. An investigator-initiated study using a 28-day continuous CFI-400945 dosing schedule at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) demonstrated clinical activity in AML [Murphy et al., 2020] and responses were seen in high-risk pts with adverse cytogenetics, including those with TP53 mutations. CFI-400945 was tolerated with clinically manageable toxicities and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was colitis. The recommended phase 2 dose was 96mg. A newer crystal form of CFI-400945 was introduced after the PMCC study. Consequently, the optimal dosing of CFI-400945, including as a combination agent, are not yet clinically defined and are the rationale for this study. Study Design and Methods: This study is a multi-part phase 1/2 study of CFI-400945 as a single agent and in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) (NCT04730258). For Part 1, pts with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Pts with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For Part 2, pts should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated pts who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study uses a standard 3 + 3 design, and the dosing schedule is 21 days on and 7 days off (28-day cycle) - this is to potentially avoid the colitis seen in the study at PMCC. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) is <1 out of 6 at highest dose level at or below the maximally administered dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers will be assessed. Results: As of the 30Jun22 data cut off, 9 pts had been enrolled into the study. Four (44%) pts had AML, 2 (22%) had MDS, 3 (33%) had CMML. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-4), and 2 (22%) pts had received a stem cell transplant. Six (66%) were male and the median age was 69 (range 22-75). Three of 4 AML pts had unfavorable risk cytogenetics by ELN 2017 criteria, and 2 pts (1 each with MDS, CMML) with TP53 mutations. Five pts received 32mg and 4 pts 48mg. There have been no DLTs. There have been 8 (89%) SAEs with the following occurring in >2 pts (febrile neutropenia (6 pts), pneumonia (2 pts)). Common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) in > 2 pts were febrile neutropenia 6 pts (67%), hypokalemia 5pts (56%), anemia and hypomagnesemia 4 pts each (44%), hypophosphatemia, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, peripheral edema 3 pts each (33%). Thirty-three percent (20 events, 3 pts) of the grade 3 or greater TEAE's were considered related to CFI-400945. There have been no CR or PR per ELN response criteria observed to date, however, there were 2 (50%) SD per IWG criteria at the 48 mg dose level (1-MDS, 1-CMML). Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluations indicated that the mean terminal-life ranged from 7 - 10 hours. Low accumulation was observed after 21 days of daily dosing (AR <2-fold). In general, exposure in this study is overlapped with that observed in the PMCC study. PD studies evaluating the effect of CFI-400945 on markers of mitosis, ploidy, and centriole function are ongoing. Conclusion: CFI-400945 has been generally well tolerated and TWT-202 continues to enroll in Part 1. There have been no responses per ELN to date but there was SD in 2 pts (48 mg dose). Lack of DLTs suggest dose level is still suboptimal at time of submission. PK characteristics support daily dosing of CFI-400945 and PD studies are ongoing. Dose escalation continues in this study and updated data will be presented. References:Murphy et al, Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of CFI-400495, a PLK4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk MDS Blood (2020) 136 (Supplement 1): 1-2

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207