MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310120142 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-157691

Mosunetuzumab Monotherapy Demonstrates Durable Efficacy with a Manageable Safety Profile in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Who Received ≥2 Prior Therapies: Updated Results from a Pivotal Phase II Study

2022· article· en· W4310120142 sur OpenAlexaff
Nancy L. Bartlett, Laurie H. Sehn, Matthew J. Matasar, Stephen J. Schuster, Sarit Assouline, Pratyush Giri, John Kuruvilla, Miguel Canales, Sascha Dietrich, Keith Fay, Matthew Ku, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Michael C. Wei, Shen Yin, Iris To, Huang Huang, Juliana Min, Elicia Penuel, Lihua E. Budde

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversitySpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFollicular lymphomaMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Safety profileOncologyInternal medicineRituximabLymphomaPhases of clinical researchFollicular phaseClinical trialAdverse effect

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific monoclonal antibody (Bi-mAb) that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. Mosun is the first Bi-mAb approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL; EMA 2022) and is a fixed-duration treatment that can be administered in an outpatient setting. In a Phase II study (NCT02500407), Mosun demonstrated a high rate of complete response (CR) with a manageable safety profile in pts with R/R FL who had received ≥2 prior therapies (Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022). Here, we present updated data for this cohort after a median follow-up of 27 months. Methods: Pts with FL grade (gr) 1-3a, who had received ≥2 prior therapies (including an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylator) were enrolled. Intravenous Mosun was administered in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C) 1 (Day [D] 1, 1mg; C1D8, 2mg; C1D15/C2D1, 60mg; C3D1 and onwards, 30mg). Pts achieving a CR by C8 completed treatment without additional cycles; those with a partial response or stable disease received a further nine cycles (17 total). Hospitalization following infusion was not required. The primary endpoint was CR rate determined by an Independent Review Committee. Post-hoc analyses were performed to compare efficacy outcomes with Mosun vs last prior therapy, and assess the correlation between cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and tumor response. Results: Ninety pts with R/R FL and ≥2 prior therapies were enrolled. Median age was 60 years (range: 29-90), and 77% of pts had stage III/IV disease. Median number of prior lines of therapy was three (range: 2-10); 53% of pts were double refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy and alkylator therapy; and 52% of pts had progressive disease within 24 months from the start of their first-line therapy. As of May 20, 2022, median time on study was 26.7 months (range: 2.0-36.2); 54 pts (60%) had completed initial treatment and 36 pts (40%) had discontinued initial treatment (25 pts [28%] due to progressive disease). Two pts (2%) were undergoing retreatment, 72 pts (80%) were in follow-up, and 16 pts (18%) had discontinued the study. In all 90 pts, investigator (INV)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and CR rate were 77.8% (95% CI: 67.8-85.9) and 60.0% (95% CI: 49.1-70.2), respectively. Median duration of response (DOR) and duration of CR (DOCR) were not reached (NR); 79.5% of complete responders remained in remission for at least 24 months based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. Median progression-free survival (PFS) per INV assessment was NR; 24-month PFS was 51.4% (95% CI: 39.4-63.3). The efficacy of Mosun was compared with that of pts' last prior therapy: most pts (63%) received chemoimmunotherapy as their last prior therapy, and the remainder received PI3K inhibitor-containing regimens (8%), anti-CD20 antibodies plus lenalidomide (2%), CAR-T therapy (2%), or other therapies. Response rates, PFS, DOR, DOCR and time to next therapy or death were all improved with Mosun compared with last prior therapy (Table;Figure). No new CRS events, or fatal, serious, or gr ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported since the previous analysis, and no evidence of chronic toxicity was observed. Overall, the rate of AEs leading to discontinuation was low (4.4%) and no treatment-related gr 5 AEs were observed. CRS events (44.4% of pts) were mostly confined to C1 (84.5% of events) and 97.2% were gr 1/2 in severity; all CRS events resolved. No correlation was observed between the occurrence of CRS and tumor response. ORR was 77.5% and 78.0%, respectively, in pts with or without CRS events. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, with a median follow-up of 27 months, durable responses continued to be observed with Mosun in pts with R/R FL. Compared with pts' last prior therapy, Mosun demonstrated higher ORR and CR rates, with longer DOR, DOCR, PFS and time to next therapy, although limitations should be noted for retrospective comparisons and the absence of standardized imaging assessment for the last prior therapy. The safety profile, characterized by a low rate of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation and predominantly low-grade CRS events, was consistent with previous reports and supports the administration of Mosun as an outpatient regimen. Clinical response was observed regardless of occurrence of CRS, suggesting the Mosun dose and schedule used is effective at dissociating cytokine toxicity from treatment efficacy. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,120
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations31
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207