MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310127269 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-169675

Unravelling the Effect of Blood Type on FVIII:C Levels and Response to DDAVP in 20 Males with a Single Genotype (<i>Twillingate</i> Variant) Causing Mild Hemophilia Α

2022· article· en· W4310127269 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Caroline Malcolmson, Michael Shu, Vanessa Bouskill, Ann Marie Stain, Cindy Wakefield, Victor S. Blanchette, Manuel Carção

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenotypeMedicineInternal medicineImmunologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) occurs secondary to >1000 variants in the F8 gene resulting in decreased/absent production of factor (F) VIII. FVIII:C (coagulant) levels in persons with mild/moderate HA are most impacted by their genotype. ABO blood type (BT) may also impact endogenous FVIII:C levels, but this impact is difficult to assess in a genetically heterogenous group of HA subjects. Canada has a population of mild-moderate HA secondary to a unique large single genotype: c.6104T>C, p.Val2035Ala. This variant arose from a founder effect that occurred about 200 years ago in Twillingate, Newfoundland. We hypothesized that subjects with the Twillingate genotype (despite having the same genotype and thus producing similar amounts of FVIII) would show different endogenous FVIII:C levels related to their BT, as BT impacts FVIII (and VWF) clearance. Our study objectives were to understand the impact of BT on endogenous FVIII:C levels whilst controlling for genotype, and to explore the impact of BT on DDAVP responsiveness. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Males with a confirmed Twillingate genotype treated at our center between 1980-01-01 to 2022-03-01 were eligible. For each subject, ABO BT, VWF antigen (Ag) and activity, and FVIII:C levels were determined by chart review. We recorded the lowest FVIII:C baseline level; for subjects who had >1 FVIII:C level (done in a non-bleeding state) we also determined their mean baseline FVIII:C level. For DDAVP challenges, the age at the challenge, dose, and route of administration were recorded, as well as pre and 1-hr post FVIII:C levels. Based on 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels (IU/mL), subjects were classified on their DDAVP response as responders (≥0.50), partial responders (0.30 to 0.49), or non-responders (<0.30). Median, IQR, mean, and SD were calculated for baseline FVIII:C and VWF:Ag levels, stratified by age (<12; ≥12 y) and by BT (O; non-O). T-tests and Mann-Whitney U (MWU) tests were used to compare normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. The Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test was used to compare responses to DDAVP between O and non-O subjects. Statistical significance was considered as p≤0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28. Results: 20 males were included: 9 were O BT and 11 were non-O BT (10 were A, 1 was B). There were statistically significant differences between the 2 ABO groups in their median lowest FVIII:C levels: 0.05 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.08 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.05 (MWU) and in mean FVIII:C levels: medians: 0.08 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.12 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.02 (t-test). Too few subjects had FVIII:C levels reported at ≥12 y of age to perform statistical analyses. Fifteen subjects (8 O BT: 7 non-O BT) underwent a DDAVP challenge; 13 performed at our center and 2 elsewhere. Median 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels were 0.32 IU/mL (O BT) and 0.43 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.04 (t-test). The absolute FVIII:C increase with DDAVP was not statistically different between the 2 groups: median increase of 0.22 IU/mL (O BT) vs. 0.28 IU/mL (non-O BT); p=0.10 (t-test) nor was the FVIII:C fold increase: median increase 3.3-fold (O BT) vs. 3.3-fold (non-O BT); p=0.51 (t-test). Among O BT subjects, none were responders, 5 were partial responders and 3 were non-responders. In the non-O BT subjects, 2 were responders and 5 were partial responders. The variation in response between the 2 groups failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.14). Given uncertainties in DDAVP challenges (e.g. dose, route of administration) done elsewhere, we also analyzed the DDAVP challenge results just for the 13 subjects from our center. The median 1-hr post-DDAVP FVIII:C levels were 0.30 IU/mL in 7 O BT subjects and 0.45 IU/mL in 6 non-O BT subjects; p=0.02 (t-test). Conclusions: This study shows that in HA subjects with an identical genotype, BT significantly impacts FVIII:C levels. Although only 1 unique genotype was studied, we believe that other hemophilic variants leading to mild HA will behave similarly. This may explain why in subjects with mild HA, there is an overrepresentation of O BT. Persons with non-O BT and HA variants that only slightly reduce FVIII production may have FVIII:C levels that are not as reduced and thus may never present with bleeding and be diagnosed with HA. In contrast, if such persons have O BT, they are likely to show much lower FVIII:C levels and thus more likely to bleed and be diagnosed with HA. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→